ZeePedia

PSYCHOANALYTIC ALTERNATIVES:EGO ANALYSIS, CURATIVE FACTORS

<< THE BEGINNING OF PSYCHOANALYSIS:THE CASE OF ANNA, THE INSTINCTS
CLIENT CENTERED THERAPY:PURPOSE, BACKGROUND, PROCESS >>
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
LESSON 30
PSYCHOANALYTIC ALTERNATIVES
Psychoanalytic theory underwent considerable modification by the Neo-Freudians, Alfred Adler, Carl Jung,
Otto-Rank, the ego analysts and others. The seminal contributions of Freud remained, but the emphases
often changed. Jung made much more of dreams and symbolic processes. Rank elevated the birth trauma to
a preeminent position. Adler and the neo-Freudians stressed the importance of culture, learning, and social
relationships instead of instinctual forces.
Such variations would be expected to influence the methods of therapy. However, these changes often did
little to alter the critical roles of free association, dream analysis, interpretation, transference, and resistance.
The supreme role of insight was little changed. In sight came about through traditional psychoanalytic
methods, but now it was the insight of Horney or Fromm or-Sullivan. The neurotic symptom was seen as
rooted not only in repressed sexual or aggressive urges; it now became the outgrowth of a fear of being
alone or of the insecurity that goes along with the adult role. In most of these early variants of
psychoanalysis, interpretation remained the essential therapeutic ingredient. What distinguished these
variants was often the content of the interpretation-the different ways in which unconscious material was
construed by the analyst.
Over the years, enough changes have been made in traditional psychoanalysis that those who no longer
practice the strict Freudian techniques are often said to be practicing "psychoanalytically oriented" therapy.
These changes involve many factors. In some cases, the number of analytic sessions is reduced from five
per week to three, and the entire treatment process may last but a year and a half (Alexander & French,
1946). The therapist is no longer inevitably seated behind the patient's couch but now often sits at a desk
with the patient seated in a facing chair. Perhaps the easiest way to characterize these and other
modifications is to say that greater flexibility has been introduced. Although basic Freudian tenets are still
observed, the overall context is not so rigid. For example, free association is no longer absolutely required
by these psychoanalytically oriented therapists. The importance of dreams may be downplayed somewhat.
Drugs and even hypnosis may be used.
For many years, the therapy room was like an inner sanctum. The therapist talked with the patient and no
one else. Now, family members or a spouse are often consulted, or sometimes therapy is conducted with the
family as a unit. There tends to be much less emphasis on the past (childhood) and a more active confronta-
tion with the present. Even the nature of the clientele has changed a bit. Clinics or institutes now provide
some therapeutic services to aging clients, minority group clients, and others who have not traditionally
received psychoanalytic treatment. They have tried to open up therapy to nontraditional populations. Again,
none of this is meant to be a denial of Freudian principles; rather, it is a demonstration that traditional
Freudian treatment procedures are not the only therapeutic techniques that can be deduced from Freudian
psychoanalytic theory.
EGO ANALYSIS:
The ego analysis movement originating from within the framework of traditional psychoanalysis rather than
as a splinter group, held that classical psychoanalysis overemphasized unconscious of ego processes. This
group of theorists accepted the role of the ego in mediating the conflict between the id and the real world
but believed that the ego also performed other extremely important functions. They emphasized the
adaptive, "conflict-free" functions of the ego, including memory, learning, and perception. These theorists
include Hartmann (1939), Anna Freud (1946a), Kris (1950), Erikson (1956), and Rapaport_ (1953).
Ego-analytic psychotherapy has not departed from the usual therapy methods except in degree. In a sense,
the ego analysts seem to prefer reeducative goals rather than the reconstructive goals of orthodox
psychoanalysis. The exploration of infantile experience and the induction of a transference neurosis seem to
be less common in ego-analytic therapy than in classical psychoanalysis. Ego-analytic therapy focuses more
on contemporary problems in living than on a massive examination and reinstatement of the past. Also, the
224
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
therapist must understand not only the neurotic aspects of the patient's personality but also the effective
parts and how they interact with those neurotic trends.
The ego-analytic approach has also tended to emphasize the importance of building the patient's trust
through "reparenting" in the therapy relationship. This approach sometimes even views transference as an
impediment to therapy and works toward building adaptive defenses in the patient (Blanck & Blanck,
1974).
OTHER CONTEMPORARY DEVELOPMENTS:
In particular, the work of Horney, Sullivan, and Adler has been important in giving a new spin to
psychoanalysis. Likewise, ego psychology and theories of object relations have encouraged an emphasis on
the manner in which the patient relates to other people, rather than on conflicts among-, instinctual forces.
For example, object relations theorists see the need to form relationships with others as a primary influence
on human behavior. Therefore, these theorists focus more on the role of love and hate, as well as autonomy
and dependency, in the development of the self. In the self psychology of Kohut (1977), the central task of
maturation is not the successful negotiation of the psychosexual stages but the development of an integrated
self.
Discussions of changes in psychoanalytic therapies emphasize a shift in the therapeutic focus to the "here
and now" and to the interpersonal exchanges that occur within it (Henry, Strupp, Schacht, & Gaston, 1994).
Strupp and Binder (1984) have synthesized some of the more critical developmental changes in
psychoanalytic practice. They emphasize a movement away from the recovery of childhood memories and
their analysis toward-a focus on the corrective emotional experiences that occur through the agency of the
therapeutic relationship. The transference relationship as it occurs now helps provide the means for
constructive changes in interpersonal relations outside the therapy room.
BRIEF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY:
Perhaps the chief practical thrust of recent years is psychodynamic therapy has been the development of
brief methods (Goldfried, Greenberg, & Manna), 1990, Koss, Butcher, & Strupp, 1986). Many of these
brief therapies retain their psychodynamic identity even as they are employed in emergency, crisis-oriented
situations. This allows the therapist to capitalize on the patient's heightened motivation and also to depend
on the transference relationship (Goldfried et al., 1990).
Although it would be nice to believe that theory and/or research considerations have dictated the shift
toward briefer psychotherapies, this is not entirely the case. An important driving force has been the
increasing focus on cost containment in health care systems (Cummings, 1986). Insurers have been cutting
the number of visits for which they will reimburse therapists. Cost containment has also provided indirect
competition from psychiatrists, who frequently prescribe medications rather than psychotherapy. The net
effect has been a turn to brief psychotherapy to remain economically competitive.
There are now several hundred different brands of brief therapy. In fact, the widespread availability of these
treatments has diminished the exclusive role of psychiatrists and brought many non medical therapists into
the arena. Not all of these briefer therapies could be labeled psychodynamic. In some cases, briefer
therapies are highly similar to crisis intervention techniques. Finally, many forms of brief psychotherapy are
quite eclectic in their approach (Garfield. 1989).
Although some define 25 sessions as the upper limit of brief therapy, others indicate that the range can be
from one session to 40 or 50. However, the issue seems less the number of sessions than the rationing of
time allotted to therapy (Budman & Gunman, 1983) and the state of mind in patient and therapist alike.
Events move rapidly in crisis-oriented therapy. Thus, the quest for insight is not the leisurely process that it
is in traditional forms of psychotherapy. The entire working through process is accelerated. The ultimate
goal is not reconstruction of the personality, but the development of a benign cycle of functioning and the
225
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
better handling of day to day problems in living. Transference is encouraged, but mainly as a means of
ensuring that the therapist will be perceived as helpful, competent, and active.
Specific techniques in brief therapy are numerous. However, the maintenance of a clear and specific focus
on realistic goals is important. Usually, the level of therapist activity is high, and both therapist and patient
are keenly aware of the element of time. The therapist is likely to use homework assignments for the
patient. To involve relatives or significant others in the treatment plan. Supportive activities outside therapy
are likely to be used well (for example, exercise, Overeaters Anonymous). There tends to be a great deal of
flexibility in treatment activities that take brief therapy beyond the strict psychodynamic perspective.
Research evidence attests to the efficacy of brief forms of psychotherapy across a number of clinical
conditions (Koss & Shiang, 1994), and evidence suggests- that brief psychodynamic psychotherapy may be
as effective as traditional time unlimited psychoanalysis.
INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY; AN EMPIRICALLY SUPPORTED TREATMENT:
A particular form of brief therapy that is psychodynamic in flavor deserves mention. It has received a great
deal of attention from psychotherapy researchers, and it has been highlighted in several practice guidelines.
Interpersonal psychotherapy or IPT is a brief insight oriented approach that has been applied primarily to
depressive disorders although it has been_ modified for use in the treatment of other disorders (such as
substance abuse and bulimia) as well. When used to treat depression, IPT involves thorough assessment of
depressive symptoms, targeting a major problem area (such as delayed grief, role transitions or disputes, or
interpersonal deficits), and alleviating depressive symptoms by improving relationships with other
improving communication skills and social skills). IPT has been shown to be effective in treating acute
depressive episodes and in preventing or delaying the recurrence of depressive episodes. Given below are
the major features and characteristics of IPT.
FEATURES OF INTERPERSONAL PSYCHOTHERAPY:
IPT is a brief form of psychodynamic psychotherapy that has been used in numerous research studies. It is
one of the treatments cited as examples of empirically validated/ supported treatments by the Division 12
Task Force of the American Psychological Association. Weissman and Markowitz (1998) discuss the
primary features of IPT.
Focus:
IPT focuses on the connection between onset of clinical problems and current interpersonal problems (with
friends, partners, and relatives). Current social problems are addressed, not enduring personality traits or
styles.
Length: Typically 12-16 weeks.
Role Of The IPT Therapist:
IPT therapists are active, no neutral, and supportive. They use realism and optimism to counter patients'
typically negative and pessimistic outlook. Therapists emphasize the possibility for change and highlight
options that may effect positive change.
PHASE OF TREATMENT:
1. First phase (up to 3 sessions): This includes a diagnostic evaluation and psychiatric history, an
interpersonal functioning assessment, and patient education about the nature of the clinical condition (such
as depression). The therapist provides a clinical formulation of the patient's difficulties by linking symptoms
to current interpersonal problems, issues, and situations.
2. Second phase: Depending on which interpersonal problem area has been chosen (for example, grief, role
disputes, role transition, and interpersonal deficits), specific strategies and goals are pursued. For example,
treatment focusing on role disputes would aim to help the patient explore the problematic relationships, the
226
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
nature of the problems, and the options for resolving them. If an impasse has been reached in a relationship,
the therapist helps the patient find ways to circumvent whatever is hindering progress or to end the
relationship.
3. Third phase (last 2-3 sessions): The patient's progress and mastery experiences are reinforced and
consolidated. The IPT therapist reinforces the patient's sense of confidence and autonomy. Methods of
dealing with a recurrence of clinical symptoms are discussed.
EVALUATION OF PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY:
In this section, we will review the available empirical evaluations and offer some general observations
about those psychotherapeutic practices that trace their origins to the psychoanalytic method.
DOES PSYCHODYNAMIC PSYCHOTHERAPY WORKS?
What evidence is there that the psychodynamic approach is effective? We know the widely known meta-
analytic study by Smith, Glass, and Miller (1980) that examined the effectiveness of psychotherapy. In
addition to examining the effects of psychotherapy in general, these authors also reported effects separately
for different types of psychological intervention. They found that the average patient who had received
psychodynamic psychotherapy was functioning better than 75%, of those who had received no treatment.
Two recent meta-analyses of studies examining the effectiveness of brief psychodynamic psychotherapy
have produced conflicting results, with one supporting the efficacy of brief psychodynamic treatment (Crits-
Christoph, 1992) but the other not (Svartberg & Stiles, 1991). Based on these and other results, we offer the
tentative conclusion that there appears to be at least modest support for the effectiveness of psychodynamic
psychotherapy. However, a number of thorny methodological issues plague research on psychodynamic
therapy (for example, appropriate outcome measures, length of treatment), and additional investigations are
warranted.
INTERPRETATION AND INSIGHT:
A wide range of current psychotherapies depend to a greater or lesser extent on the patient's achieving
insight through therapist interpretation. Psychoanalysis seems to retain its total commitment to insight as the
supreme means for solving problems in living. When understanding is complete enough, it is believed that
the patients' symptoms will be ameliorated, or even disappear entirely.
This emphasis on the pursuit of understanding has great appeal to many people. For example, although
many people who are sad may seek the therapeutic goal of happiness, most of them are not content just to
become happy they also want to know why they are sad. The commitment of psychoanalysis and its
psychotherapeutic heirs to insight and understanding is their greatest asset, but it also contains the seeds of
their failures. Especially in the case of psychoanalysis, reconstruction of the personality through insight and
understanding can lead to a nearly interminable and sometimes exhausting examination of the past and
analysis of motives. Although one can hardly fault psychoanalysis for teaching the importance of the past in
shaping the present, there can be too much of a good thing. At times, it almost seems that the patient can use
the need for understanding and the pursuit of the past as reasons not to come to grips with current problems.
The endless analysis of conflicts and motives and of their childhood origins can easily replace the need to
find solutions and behavioral alternatives to problems in living. Although learning the reasons for one's
problems may be important (and ultimately efficient if one is to attain generalized rather than piecemeal
solutions), the failure to emphasize alternative ways of behaving can be a major shortcoming of traditional
psychoanalysis.
Psychoanalysis often appears to involve a tacit assumption that more adaptive behavior will occur
automatically once insight is achieved by the working through process that behavioral change will surely
follow insight. However, the evidence for this assumption is exceedingly sparse. In fact, it has been argued
for some time that the true course of events follows_ a reverse pattern that insight is brought about by
behavioral change (Alexander & French, 1946).
227
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
One of the chief methods used by psychodynamic clinicians to facilitate patient insight is the interpretation
of transference. A recent review of empirical studies that examined transference interpretation in
psychodynamic psychotherapy (W. P. Henry et al., 1994) offers the following general conclusions:
1. The frequency of interpretations made is not related to better outcome. Indeed, some studies have found
that a higher frequency of interpretation is related to poorer outcome.
2. Transference interpretations do not result in a greater degree of affective experience in the patient as
compared with other types of interpretations or other types of interventions. When followed by affective
responses, however, transference interpretations appear to be related to positive outcome.
3. Interpretations by the therapist are more likely to result in defensive responding on the part of the patient
than are other types of interventions. Frequent transference interpretations may damage the therapeutic rela-
tionship.
4. Clinicians' accuracy of interpretations may be lower than was previously believed.
The authors summarize: "The available findings challenge some clearly held beliefs. In short, transference
interpretations do not seem uniquely effective, may pose greater process risks, and may be counter
therapeutic under certain conditions" (W. P. Henry et al., 1994, p. 479).
This is not to say that transference interpretations are always harmful and should be avoided. Rather, the
existing research suggests that the relationship between interpretation and outcome is a complex one that is
likely to depend on factors such as patient characteristics, clinician interpersonal style, timing of interpre-
tations, and accuracy of interpretations (W. P. Henry et al., 1994).
CURATIVE FACTORS:
What, then, seems to be responsible for positive outcomes following psychodynamic psychotherapy? The
empirical evidence points to the, strength of the therapeutic alliance (W.-P. Henry et al., 1994). Although
the quality of the therapeutic alliance is related to outcome across a number of therapeutic modalities (for
example,
client-centered,
cognitive-behavioral),
it is interesting to note that the importance of the clinician-patient relationship was recognized by Freud
(1912/1966). Although various definitions of the therapeutic alliance have been proposed, this term is
generally used to refer to the patient's affective bond to the therapist. A positive relationship or strong bond
facilitates self examination by the patient and permits interpretation. Presumably, a strong therapeutic
alliance makes it less likely that a patient will react defensively to interpretations by the clinician. Research
evidence suggests a direct link between alliance and outcome, whether short-term or long-term
psychodynamic treatments are examined and regardless of the particular outcome measure used M. P.
Henry et al., 1994).
THE LACK OF EMPHASIS ON BEHAVIOR:
The stereotypic practitioner of psychoanalytic psychotherapy plays a relatively passive role except for
interpretation. The failure to deal_ with behavior to make suggestions or to adopt a generally more activist
posture would seem to prolong psychotherapy unnecessarily. For example, it may be true that a male
patient's unhappy heterosexual adjustment or lack of skills with women stems from unconscious
generalizations from past unfavorable comparisons with a dominant brother. But simple insight into the
childhood origins of the problem does not provide the skills that are lacking. The patient's expectations for
success in establishing relationships with women will continue to be low and a source of anxiety until a
heterosexual behavioral repertoire is established. An active therapist who not only provides interpretations
that will lead to insight but also guides the patient into new learning situations seems more likely_ to
achieve lasting solutions to the patient's problems than does a therapist who relies solely on insight. (Or
solely on behavior, for that matter).
228
img
Clinical Psychology­ (PSY401)
VU
It seems clear that a major reason for the rapid rise of the behavioral therapies was the failure of so many
psychotherapists to deal directly with the specific problems of the patient. The approach inevitably seemed
to be one of relegating the presenting problem to the status of a "symptom of something deeper." The
therapist then began working with that "something deeper" while clinging to the abiding belief that once the
patient understood it, the symptom or deficit would disappear. Unfortunately, things did not work out that
way often enough. In any case, more and more therapists are trying to foster both insight and behavioral
alternatives in their patients.
THE ECONOMICS OF PSYCHOTHERAPY:
By its very nature (reconstruction of the personality), psychoanalysis is a long and costly procedure. Its
course over three to five years and the long and costly preparation of its practitioners ensure that it will be
an expensive undertaking. Consequently, it has become a therapy for the affluent for those who have both
the money and the time to pursue the resolution of their neuroses. Moreover, the procedures of psycho-
analysis are such that only relatively intelligent, sophisticated, and educated groups are likely to be able to
accept the therapeutic demands it makes. For all these reasons, only a small portion of those in need of
psychotherapy are likely to be reached by traditional psychoanalysis. The poor, the undereducated, minority
groups, older populations, the severely disturbed, and those beset by reality burdens of living for which they
are woefully unprepared will in all likelihood not become psychoanalytic patients.
For these reasons alone, many regard psychoanalysis as a failure. It is inherently incapable of putting even a
dent in the mental health problems of the nation. Yet, for persons who have the necessary personal qualities
and financial resources, psychoanalysis has been helpful, particularly for those whose problems can best be
met through the development of understanding.
Psychoanalytic techniques seem to have helped many patients, and as a theory of therapy, psychoanalysis
undergirds many forms of psychotherapy. Yet many clinicians still question whether, after all these years,
there is really much in the way of definitive research evidence for its effectiveness. These sentiments are
echoed by Wolpe (1981). Although hardly unbiased, Wolpe is particularly critical of a method that can
allow patients to remain so long in therapy, often with little evidence of improvement. Wolpe cites ex-
amples offered by Schmideberg (1970). In one case, a 54-year-old man had been in psychoanalysis for 30
years without noticeable improvement. A woman who began psychoanalysis with no specific symptoms
later developed agoraphobia and after 12 years of therapy was worse than when she began. Admittedly,
nearly every brand of therapy contains its share of horror stories. But lengthy therapy combined with little
improvement does raise questions.
It is encouraging, however, that brief forms of psychodynamic psychotherapy have been developed. Crits-
Christoph (1992) meta-analysis indicates that brief psychodynamic treatments that incorporate the use of
manuals show stronger treatment effects (versus psychodynamic treatments that do not use manuals) and in
some cases may be equivalent to other forms of brief psychological treatment. In addition to providing
encouragement to psycho dynamically oriented clinicians, this finding should serve to impel them toward
mastery and use of manual based, empirically supported brief psychodynamic treatments, such as
interpersonal psychotherapy (Markowitz, 1998). This approach is both scientifically defensible and
appealing to managed care companies.
229
Table of Contents:
  1. MENTAL HEALTH TODAY: A QUICK LOOK OF THE PICTURE:PARA-PROFESSIONALS
  2. THE SKILLS & ACTIVITIES OF A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST:THE INTERNSHIP
  3. HOW A CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST THINKS:Brian’s Case; an example, PREDICTION
  4. HISTORICAL OVERVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY:THE GREEK PERIOD
  5. HISTORY OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY:Research, Assessment, CONCLUSION
  6. HOW CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS BECAME INVOLVED IN TREATMENT
  7. MODELS OF TRAINING IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY:PROFESSIONAL SCHOOLS
  8. CURRENT ISSUES IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY:CERTIFICATION, LICENSING
  9. ETHICAL STANDARDS FOR CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGISTS:PREAMBLE
  10. THE ROLE OF RESEARCH IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY:LIMITATION
  11. THE RESEARCH PROCESS:GENERATING HYPOTHESES, RESEARCH METHODS
  12. THE CONCEPT OF ABNORMAL BEHAVIOR & MENTAL ILLNESS
  13. CAUSES OF MENTAL ILLNESOVERVIEW OF ETIOLOGY:PANDAS
  14. THE PROCESS OF DIAGNOSIS:ADVANTAGES OF DIAGNOSIS, DESCRIPTION
  15. THE CONCEPT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT IN CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
  16. THE CLINICAL INTERVIEW:The intake / admission interview, Structured interview
  17. THE ASSESSMENT OF INTELLIGENCE:RELIABILTY AND VALIDITY, CATTELL’S THEORY
  18. INTELLIGENCE TESTS:PURPOSE, COMMON PROCEDURES, PURPOSE
  19. THE USE AND ABUSE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTING:PERSONALITY
  20. THE PROJECTIVE PERSONALITY TESTS:THE RORSCHACH
  21. THE OBSERVATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ITS TYPES:Home Observation
  22. THE BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT THROUGH INTERVIEWS, INVENTORIES AND CHECK LISTS
  23. THE PROCESS AND ACCURACY OF CLINICAL JUDGEMENT:Comparison Studies
  24. METHODS OF IMPROVING INTERPRETATION AND JUDGMENT
  25. PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTIONS AND THEIR GOALS:THE EXPERT ROLE
  26. IMPORTANCE OF PSYCHOTHERAPY:ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
  27. COURSE OF NEW CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS:IMPLEMENTING TREATMENT
  28. NATURE OF SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC VARIABLES:CLIENT’S MOTIVATION
  29. THE BEGINNING OF PSYCHOANALYSIS:THE CASE OF ANNA, THE INSTINCTS
  30. PSYCHOANALYTIC ALTERNATIVES:EGO ANALYSIS, CURATIVE FACTORS
  31. CLIENT CENTERED THERAPY:PURPOSE, BACKGROUND, PROCESS
  32. GESTALT THERAPY METHODS AND PROCEDURES:SELF-DIALOGUE
  33. ORIGINS AND TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY
  34. COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY:MODELING, RATIONAL RESTRUCTURING
  35. GROUP THERAPY: METHODS AND PROCEDURES:CURATIVE FACTORS
  36. FAMILY AND COUPLES THERAPY:POSSIBLE RISKS
  37. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY:THE ENVIRONMENT
  38. METHODS OF INTERVENTION AND CHANGE IN COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY
  39. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORY OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
  40. APPLICATIONS OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY:OBESITY, HEALTH CARE TRENDS
  41. NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PERSPECTIVES AND HISTORY:STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION
  42. METHODS OF NEUROLOGICAL ASSESSMENT:Level Of Performance, Pattern Analysis
  43. FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY:Qualification, Testifying, Cross Examination, Criminal Cases
  44. PEDIATRIC AND CHILD PSYCHOLOGY: HISTORY AND PERSPECTIVE
  45. INTERVENTIONS & TRAINING IN PEDIATRIC AND CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY