ZeePedia

CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY CORRELATIONAL METHOD:

<< CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OBSERVATIONAL METHOD
CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL METHOD >>
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Lesson 07
CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
CORRELATIONAL METHOD:
Aims:
To make students understand how to conduct social psychology research using diverse scientific
methodologies.
Objectives:
Describe correlational research method
Understand causal and effect relationships in correlational research
Discuss survey method as the most commonly used method of correlational research
Understand designs used in surveys
Correlational Research
Besides describing behavior, social psychologists are also interested in learning whether two or more
variables are related, and if so, how strongly. When changes in one variable relate to changes in another
variable, we say that they correlate. Correlational research assesses the nature of the relationship between
two or more variables that are not controlled by the researcher. In studying the relationship between
children's TV viewing habits and their aggressive behavior, researchers using the correlational method do
not try to influence how much time any of the children in the study actually spend viewing violent shows.
Instead, they merely gather information on the amount of time the children spend watching such programs
and their degree of aggressive behavior, and then determine how these two variables correlate. A
correlation assesses the extent to which two variables covary
Correlation indicates?
·
Direction
·
Magnitude of a relationship
The direction and strength of the relationship between two variables are described by the statistical measure
known as the correlation coefficient (r). Strength Basis of prediction
This correlation coefficient can range from -
1.00 to +1.00 (perfect correlations). Figure 1
D ire c tio n o f R e la tio n s h ip
demonstrates positive and negative
relationships, along with zero or no
relationship.
Figure 1
Correlation & Causality
Cannot be used to determine "cause and
effect" correlation between being outgoing
and satisfied with life;
negative
no relationship
positive
Two problems in determining causality:
·  reverse-causality problem (aggressive boys)
·  third-variable problem: Spurious relationship
Figure 3: An example of Spurious Relationship
Correlation: Path Analysis
30
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
A statistical technique is used to understand potential causes of correlational relationships
Figure 4 illustrates the direct relation
A n S p u r io u s R e la t io n s h ip
between parental support and getting
adjusted in college, while a mediating
·  O b s e rv e d c o r re la tio n (+ d ire c t r )
variable, approach coping, is also
indirectly affecting these two links.
S h o e s iz e
M a th s k ill
Figure 4: Path Analysis
·
S p u rio u s c a u s a l re la tio n s h ip
A c tu a l c a u s a l re la tio n
S h o e s iz e
M a th s k ill
A ge
SURVEYS
Although  studying  the  relationships
among variables can be done by directly
S h o e s iz e
M a th s k ill
S h o e s iz e
M a th s k ill
observing behavior or examining archived
information, it is often accomplished by
asking  people  carefully  constructed
questions. Surveys are structured sets of questions or statements given to a group of people to measure
their attitudes, beliefs, values, or behavioral tendencies (Lavrakas, 1993; Schuman, 2002).
The
four
major
survey
techniques are face-to-face surveys,
C o rre la tio n : P a th A n a lys is
written surveys, phone surveys, and
computer surveys. The face-to-face
format  provides  highly  detailed
· A statis tical tec hniq u e
M ediator
information and allows researchers the
Approach
use d to u n de rs ta n d
coping
best opportunity to clarify any unclear
pote ntia l ca us es of
Path C
questions. However, it is costly and
corre lation al
Path B
there is always the possibility that
relations hips
people's responses might be influenced
Change in
Parental
by the interviewer's presence. Written,
adjustment
Support
in college
phone, and computer surveys eliminate
such interviewer bias and are much less
Path A
expensive.
(direct)
An important consideration in
V alentiner et al., 1994
constructing  surveys  involves  how
questions are asked. Survey questions usually are either open-ended or closed-ended.
An open-ended question requires a response that must have more than just a yes or no answer--
research participants provide a narrative response. A closed-ended question, in contrast, is answered with a
yes or no, or by choosing a single response from several alternatives. Closed-ended questions are the
quickest and easiest to score. In contrast, open-ended questions may provide information from respondents
that might be missed with closed-ended questions. However, open-ended responses require coding by
carefully trained judges and this is a time-consuming process.
One of the most important considerations in conducting surveys--as well as when using other
methods--is getting responses from people who represent the population as a whole. This representative
sample is often obtained through random selection, which is a procedure in which everyone in the
population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. As long as a sample is selected randomly,
you are reasonably assured that the data will represent the overall population. However, when samples are
not randomly selected, drawing conclusions from the data can lead to serious errors.
Finally, one last problem in conducting survey research is social desirability bias, which occurs
when people respond to survey questions by trying to portray them in a favorable light rather than
responding in an accurate and truthful manner
Surveys are structured sets of questions or statements given to a group of people to measure their attitudes,
beliefs, values, or behavioral tendencies
31
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Types of surveys:
·  Face-to-face surveys
·  Written surveys
·  Phone surveys
·  Computer surveys.
Questions in Surveys
Types of questions:
·
Closed-ended questions
·
Open-ended questions
Examples
Closed-ended: Do you enjoy chatting online?
Response: Yes_____ No______
-How much you enjoy chatting online?
Likert Scales:
Birth control should be absolutely prohibited?
Strongly disagree
strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
2.
Birth control is a legitimate health measure?
Strongly disagree
strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Social Psychology-Lecture 2: e.g., Likert Scale
Open-ended: Why do you like (or not enjoy) chatting online?
Response ____________________________
Conclusion: Usually researchers attempt to utilize the strengths of both types; providing some alternatives,
and also giving opportunity to write response of their own choice.
Schuman et al conducted a survey in USA to identify the most important problems faced by the country;
from responses, they chose 4 problems only chosen by less than 3% of population; in another survey they
provided these four problems with an open-ended choice; 60% selected one of the rare problems;
concluded that respondents may not brain storm, are lazy, and take survey causally.
Order & format of Questionnaires
·
Start with easy, salient and nonthreatening questions
·
Avoid beginning with demographic and open-ended questionnaire
·
Funneling procedure: start with more general and move to more specific questions
·
Where appropriate, follow a chronological order, e.g., in job dates, case histories, etc.
·
Only use `filter' questions when unavoidable: Only use `filter' questions (e.g., if yes, go to 31, if
no, to 14) when unavoidable: it is likely that respondent may answer in such a way as to reduce the
total number of questions.
·
Avoid using double negatives.
·
In face-to-face interviews, provide cards to show the scale
32
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
Threatening Questions
How to ask? "Did you kill your wife" (Barton, 1958)
1. The casual approach
"Do you happen to have murdered your wife"
2. The numbered card
Would you please tick the number on this card which corresponds to what happened to your wife?
The natural death
I killed her
Other (what?)
3. The everyday approach
"As you know many people have been killing their wives these days. Do you happen to have killed yours?"
4. The other people approach
Do you know any people who have murdered their wives?
How about yourself?
5. The Kinsey technique
Stare firmly into respondents and ask in a matter of fact way:
"Did you ever kill your wife?"
Remember to put such question at the end of the interview
Important considerations in conducting surveys
·  Representative sample obtained through random selection
·  Social desirability bias should be minimized: Social desirability bias, which occurs when people
respond to survey questions by trying to portray themselves in a favorable light rather than
responding in an accurate and truthful manner
Designs in Surveys
Survey research is carried out according to an overall plan - a research design
1. Cross-sectional design: In Cross-sectional designs, one or more samples are drawn at one point in
time; e.g., groups of different ages
2. Longitudinal design
·  Trend studies/ Successive samples: Different samples of respondents from the population
complete the survey over a time period; they do not allow researcher to study changes in a
population over time. A problem occurs when the samples drawn are not comparable;
change in values of students, whether contemporary citizens are more informed than
citizens of an earlier generation.
·  Cohorts studies (usually age group) typically, a cohort is an age group, but may refer to
other groups also, like people who got married during 1940.
·  Panel studies: the same respondents are surveyed over time (at several points in time) in
order to examine changes in individual respondents; within subject variability is reduced;
Practice effect and drop outs are there. Moreover, if time points are more, then it is a
massive effort
Estimating sample size in surveys:
Figure 5 indicates that 2 considerations shall be in mind while deciding about number of people in one
survey:
33
img
Social Psychology (PSY403)
VU
1. Work-out number of variables: 4 here
2. Establish minimum cell size
E s tim a tin g s a m p le s iz e r e q u ir e d
M a le
F e m a le
M a r ita l
W o r k in g
U n e m p l.
W o r k in g
U n e m p l.
S ta tu s
Age
10
10
10
10
< 20
10
10
10
10
2 1 -4 0
10
10
10
10
M a r r ie d
4 1 -6 0
10
10
10
10
60+
< 20
10
10
10
10
2 1 -4 0
10
10
10
10
N ot
m a r r ie d
4 1 -6 0
10
10
10
10
60+
10
10
10
10
T o ta l R e q u ir e d = 2 x 2 x 2 x 4 = 3 2 x 1 0 = 3 2 0
34
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Readings, Main Elements of Definitions
  2. INTRODUCTION TO SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Social Psychology and Sociology
  3. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Scientific Method
  4. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:Evaluate Ethics
  5. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH PROCESS, DESIGNS AND METHODS (CONTINUED)
  6. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OBSERVATIONAL METHOD
  7. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY CORRELATIONAL METHOD:
  8. CONDUCTING RESEARCH IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
  9. THE SELF:Meta Analysis, THE INTERNET, BRAIN-IMAGING TECHNIQUES
  10. THE SELF (CONTINUED):Development of Self awareness, SELF REGULATION
  11. THE SELF (CONTINUE…….):Journal Activity, POSSIBLE HISTORICAL EFFECTS
  12. THE SELF (CONTINUE……….):SELF-SCHEMAS, SELF-COMPLEXITY
  13. PERSON PERCEPTION:Impression Formation, Facial Expressions
  14. PERSON PERCEPTION (CONTINUE…..):GENDER SOCIALIZATION, Integrating Impressions
  15. PERSON PERCEPTION: WHEN PERSON PERCEPTION IS MOST CHALLENGING
  16. ATTRIBUTION:The locus of causality, Stability & Controllability
  17. ATTRIBUTION ERRORS:Biases in Attribution, Cultural differences
  18. SOCIAL COGNITION:We are categorizing creatures, Developing Schemas
  19. SOCIAL COGNITION (CONTINUE…….):Counterfactual Thinking, Confirmation bias
  20. ATTITUDES:Affective component, Behavioral component, Cognitive component
  21. ATTITUDE FORMATION:Classical conditioning, Subliminal conditioning
  22. ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR:Theory of planned behavior, Attitude strength
  23. ATTITUDE CHANGE:Factors affecting dissonance, Likeability
  24. ATTITUDE CHANGE (CONTINUE……….):Attitudinal Inoculation, Audience Variables
  25. PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION:Activity on Cognitive Dissonance, Categorization
  26. PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION (CONTINUE……….):Religion, Stereotype threat
  27. REDUCING PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION:The contact hypothesis
  28. INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION:Reasons for affiliation, Theory of Social exchange
  29. INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION (CONTINUE……..):Physical attractiveness
  30. INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS:Applied Social Psychology Lab
  31. SOCIAL INFLUENCE:Attachment styles & Friendship, SOCIAL INTERACTIONS
  32. SOCIAL INFLUENCE (CONTINE………):Normative influence, Informational influence
  33. SOCIAL INFLUENCE (CONTINUE……):Crimes of Obedience, Predictions
  34. AGGRESSION:Identifying Aggression, Instrumental aggression
  35. AGGRESSION (CONTINUE……):The Cognitive-Neo-associationist Model
  36. REDUCING AGGRESSION:Punishment, Incompatible response strategy
  37. PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR:Types of Helping, Reciprocal helping, Norm of responsibility
  38. PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE………):Bystander Intervention, Diffusion of responsibility
  39. GROUP BEHAVIOR:Applied Social Psychology Lab, Basic Features of Groups
  40. GROUP BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE…………):Social Loafing, Deindividuation
  41. up Decision GROUP BEHAVIOR (CONTINUE……….):GroProcess, Group Polarization
  42. INTERPERSONAL POWER: LEADERSHIP, The Situational Perspective, Information power
  43. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN COURT
  44. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY APPLIED: SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY IN CLINIC
  45. FINAL REVIEW:Social Psychology and related fields, History, Social cognition