ZeePedia

ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications

<< ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory
RECAP OF LAST LESSONS:AUTOMATICITY, Automatic Processing >>
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Lesson 10
ATTENTION
Multimode Theory (continued)
A theory which proposes that people's intentions and the demands of the tasks determine the
information processing stage on which information is selected.
Experiments to test multimode theory
A series of 5 experiments was conducted to measure the amount of capacity required to perform
a task and they record how quickly a person responds to a subsidiary task (reaction time). Main
task was a selective listening task. In selective listening task there are different voices in both
ears. And subjects are asked to attend only one voice or one list and repeat it.
The Subsidiary task was to a randomly appearing light signal by pressing a button.
Subsidiary Task
A task that typically measures how quickly people can react to target stimulus in order to evaluate
the capacity demands of the primary task.
Every theory has assumption if experiment fulfills that assumption then we can say our theory is
true. Every theory predicts some phenomenon and we test these predictions through
experiments. If these predictions meet we accept theory otherwise we reject theory.
Capacity Theory
Main Assumption of Capacity Theory is;
The greater the portion of capacity allocated to selective listening (primary task), the less should
be available for monitoring the signal light, causing longer reaction times.
It means if selective listening task has more required capacity then the subsidiary task's capacity
to monitor signal light must b less that's why the reaction task is longer.
Reaction Time & Accuracy
The time it takes for the subject to respond to a stimulus is called reaction time. The longer the
time taken, the more difficult the task. If the task is demanding, subjects likely to make mistakes
and you take long time. Like mathematics is difficult subject. So we make many mistakes in
mathematics because it is demanding. If there is more demanding task, the more mistakes and
less accuracy. Less demanding task more accuracy. Some time reaction time slow but there is
accuracy.
Experiment
In this experiment pairs of words presented simultaneously to both ears through headphones.
Undergraduates at University of Utah were asked to do the following. They were asked you have
to attend the different voices. The stimulus were
Either by the pitch of the voice (male/female)
Or by semantic category (cities, occupations)
29
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
The conditions of experiment were;
1.
No lists
It means no list of stimulus was presented in both of the ears
2.
One list
Only one list was presented in one ear. May be male voice or female voice was presented.
3. Two lists
Two different lists of stimulus were presented in both ears. In this condition first understand
meanings. It is late selection. In one ear male or female voice was presented. And in other ear
different city's names or occupation's names were presented.
The rationale in that experiment was; those using pitch (male/female) were using physical
information and could use an early, sensory mode of selection because the two messages were
physically different.
Those using meaning (cities, occupations) had to use a late, semantic mode of selection because
it was necessary to know the meaning of the word before categorizing them.
Predictions of Multimode theory
Multimode theory predicts that more capacity is required to perform at a late mode of selection.
Use of the semantic mode would therefore cause slower reaction times to the light signal and
more errors on the selective listening task. You need more conditions it was late selection it
requires more capacity.
In no list the performance is best, in one list condition the performance is better, in two lists
condition performance is worst.
Results of subsidiary tasks
Performance on Subsidiary Task
When No list was given the reaction time was 310 ms
370 ms
When there was one List either female voice or cities names the reaction time was
In Two Lists condition (pitch) the reaction time was 433 ms
In Two Lists (meaning) the reaction time was 482 ms
Results of Primary Task
Percentages of Errors
In case of one List the error percentage was 1.4%
In case of Two Lists (Pitch)error percentage was 5.3%
In case of Two Lists (Meaning) error percentage was 20.5%
Implications
The implications of this experiment are;
Selective Attention requires capacity
Reaction Time slower for two lists condition over one
30
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Amount of capacity required increases from early to late selection
Reaction Time slower for meaning than for pitch (male and female).
Summary
-Attention is flexible
-People have the choice how best to use it. People can allocate attention to the task
according to their will.
-Task difficulty decreases with practice
31
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION:Historical Background
  2. THE INFORMATION PROCESSING APPROACH
  3. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY:Brains of Dead People, The Neuron
  4. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):The Eye, The visual pathway
  5. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):Hubel & Wiesel, Sensory Memory
  6. VISUAL SENSORY MEMORY EXPERIMENTS (CONTINUED):Psychological Time
  7. ATTENTION:Single-mindedness, In Shadowing Paradigm, Attention and meaning
  8. ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model
  9. ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory
  10. ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications
  11. RECAP OF LAST LESSONS:AUTOMATICITY, Automatic Processing
  12. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Experiment, Implications, Task interference
  13. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Predicting flight performance, Thought suppression
  14. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Template Matching Models, Human flexibility
  15. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Implications, Phonemes, Voicing, Place of articulation
  16. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Adaptation paradigm
  17. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Gestalt Theory of Perception
  18. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Queen Elizabeth’s vase, Palmer (1977)
  19. OBJECT PERCEPTION (continued):Segmentation, Recognition of object
  20. ATTENTION & PATTERN RECOGNITION:Word Superiority Effect
  21. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Neural Networks, Patterns of connections
  22. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Effects of Sentence Context
  23. MEMORY:Short Term Working Memory, Atkinson & Shiffrin Model
  24. MEMORY:Rate of forgetting, Size of memory set
  25. Memory:Activation in a network, Magic number 7, Chunking
  26. Memory:Chunking, Individual differences in chunking
  27. MEMORY:THE NATURE OF FORGETTING, Release from PI, Central Executive
  28. Memory:Atkinson & Shiffrin Model, Long Term Memory, Different kinds of LTM
  29. Memory:Spread of Activation, Associative Priming, Implications, More Priming
  30. Memory:Interference, The Critical Assumption, Limited capacity
  31. Memory:Interference, Historical Memories, Recall versus Recognition
  32. Memory:Are forgotten memories lost forever?
  33. Memory:Recognition of lost memories, Representation of knowledge
  34. Memory:Benefits of Categorization, Levels of Categories
  35. Memory:Prototype, Rosch and Colleagues, Experiments of Stephen Read
  36. Memory:Schema Theory, A European Solution, Generalization hierarchies
  37. Memory:Superset Schemas, Part hierarchy, Slots Have More Schemas
  38. MEMORY:Representation of knowledge (continued), Memory for stories
  39. Memory:Representation of knowledge, PQ4R Method, Elaboration
  40. Memory:Study Methods, Analyze Story Structure, Use Multiple Modalities
  41. Memory:Mental Imagery, More evidence, Kosslyn yet again, Image Comparison
  42. Mental Imagery:Eidetic Imagery, Eidetic Psychotherapy, Hot and cold imagery
  43. Language and thought:Productivity & Regularity, Linguistic Intuition
  44. Cognitive development:Assimilation, Accommodation, Stage Theory
  45. Cognitive Development:Gender Identity, Learning Mathematics, Sensory Memory