ZeePedia

ATTENTION:Single-mindedness, In Shadowing Paradigm, Attention and meaning

<< VISUAL SENSORY MEMORY EXPERIMENTS (CONTINUED):Psychological Time
ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model >>
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Lesson 07
ATTENTION
Attention is a perfect example of a cognitive psychology area. Philosophers and Scientific
Experimenters unite again to unravel attention. Philosophers theorize and scientists experiment
to reach the same goal. Computer scientists help us with simulation e.g., a camera attached with
computer. Cognitive psychologists also work with computer scientists for making simulations,
although this is not their primary job.
From Sensory Memory most of the information is discarded. Some of it is selected for further
processing. Attention plays a crucial role in this stage of selection of information.
What is attention?
Attention is conceived of as being a very limited mental resource. Numerous metaphors can help
us to think about the limited-resource characteristics of attention.
Some common metaphors;
Is it a spotlight? A beam? (On stage)
One person is standing on stage and the beam light is just fallen on him not on whole stage.
Is it a filter? A sieve (dirt is thrown, flour)
Like you are standing in a party you just listen those people in which u r standing.guest tunes in
to one message and filters out others.
Is it a bottleneck? a narrow lane? (not enough liquid, traffic can flow)
Attention: A bottleneck?
This figure is showing just attended information comes out.
Is it a limited resource? (petrol, manpower etc.)
Like skilled manpower. Countries have a lot of manpower but highly educated people are few.
Limited metaphors are;
19
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Energy: We use electricity according to its capacity. If attention is powered by a fixed
electrical current. Given the fixed energy supply, attention would be allocable to only so
many tasks. If allocated to more, the performance would degrade or a fuse would blow.
Spatial or workspace: in workspace only so many tasks can be performed. Like hundred
employees are not fitten in a small room. We fit few people in small room.
Demons: attention as a small set of agents like demons, that can perform tasks but only
one at a time.
Single-mindedness
Attention is single-minded sense so it is not double-minded sense. In terms of metaphors,
this single-mindedness would mean that only enough energy, only enough workspace, or only a
single attention demon was available for one task or process. So it means one thing at a time.
Attention is a demanding task. It has a capacity to perform only one demanding task. Attention
can't perform two demanding tasks simultaneously.
But what about walking and talking? Driving and talking, and smoking? Because tasks that are
practiced to the point at which they do not make excessive demands can be performed
simultaneously. We cannot simultaneously do mental addition and carry on a conversation is that
each activity in itself involves multiple attention-demanding subcomponents. So it is clear that
whether or not attention is truly single-minded, its capacity is severely limited.
Limitations in sensory tasks
The limited capacity of attention is the root cause of the reporting limitations demonstrated in
visual and auditory reporting tasks. Attention appears to be the real reason for whole report
performance. Limitations of the icon and echo are actually the limitations of attention. All the
information gets into sensory memory, but to be retained, each unit of information must be
attended to and transformed into some more permanent form. Sensory information needs to be
stored in a form that can be retained. Selection for this transformation happens only to attended
items. Most information is lost because attention has limited capacity.
Dichotic Listening Tasks
Cherry (1953); Moray (1959) conducted an experiment on how subjects select what sensory input
they attend to. This experiment has involved a dichotic listening task.
In dichotic listening experiment subjects wear a set of headphones. They hear two messages,
one ear presented with one message, the other ear with another message. Subjects pay attention
to (shadow) one message and tune out the other. Psychologist discovered that very little about
the unattended message is processed in a shadowing task. Subjects cannot tell what language
was spoken or report any of the words spoken even if the same word was repeated over and over
again. Subjects reported hearing very little from the other ear
In Shadowing Paradigm
The messages come in Left Ear are: ran, house, Ox, Cat....
In Right Ear the messages come are: Tea, job, books, look....
People are asked to attend to left ear. Then they report the messages that came from left ear: ran
house, Ox, Cat. And they report nothing from the left
Early Selection Model
Early selection means information is selected early, soon after the sensory store. It happens
early on in this system. Higher level processing is not done. The meanings of the words do
not have an impact at this stage in this model. The attention must be itself is a lower level
process.
20
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Early Selection Model
The figure is showing that information is coming from right and left ears. But before going to
bottom line information from one ear is blocking other ear's information. So according to this
figure attention is early selection process and low level process.
Attention and meaning
Two undergraduates at Oxford, Gray and Wedderburn (1960), conducted an experiment.
And they demonstrated that subjects were quite successful in following a message that jumped
back and forth between ears.
Shadow meaningful messages that were given to the subjects were;
Left Ear: John Eleven books
Right Ear: Eight writes Twenty
Instructed to shadow the meaningful message, subjects reported: John writes books. Thus,
subjects are capable of shadowing a message on the basis of meaning rather than physical ear.
21
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION:Historical Background
  2. THE INFORMATION PROCESSING APPROACH
  3. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY:Brains of Dead People, The Neuron
  4. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):The Eye, The visual pathway
  5. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):Hubel & Wiesel, Sensory Memory
  6. VISUAL SENSORY MEMORY EXPERIMENTS (CONTINUED):Psychological Time
  7. ATTENTION:Single-mindedness, In Shadowing Paradigm, Attention and meaning
  8. ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model
  9. ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory
  10. ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications
  11. RECAP OF LAST LESSONS:AUTOMATICITY, Automatic Processing
  12. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Experiment, Implications, Task interference
  13. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Predicting flight performance, Thought suppression
  14. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Template Matching Models, Human flexibility
  15. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Implications, Phonemes, Voicing, Place of articulation
  16. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Adaptation paradigm
  17. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Gestalt Theory of Perception
  18. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Queen Elizabeth’s vase, Palmer (1977)
  19. OBJECT PERCEPTION (continued):Segmentation, Recognition of object
  20. ATTENTION & PATTERN RECOGNITION:Word Superiority Effect
  21. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Neural Networks, Patterns of connections
  22. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Effects of Sentence Context
  23. MEMORY:Short Term Working Memory, Atkinson & Shiffrin Model
  24. MEMORY:Rate of forgetting, Size of memory set
  25. Memory:Activation in a network, Magic number 7, Chunking
  26. Memory:Chunking, Individual differences in chunking
  27. MEMORY:THE NATURE OF FORGETTING, Release from PI, Central Executive
  28. Memory:Atkinson & Shiffrin Model, Long Term Memory, Different kinds of LTM
  29. Memory:Spread of Activation, Associative Priming, Implications, More Priming
  30. Memory:Interference, The Critical Assumption, Limited capacity
  31. Memory:Interference, Historical Memories, Recall versus Recognition
  32. Memory:Are forgotten memories lost forever?
  33. Memory:Recognition of lost memories, Representation of knowledge
  34. Memory:Benefits of Categorization, Levels of Categories
  35. Memory:Prototype, Rosch and Colleagues, Experiments of Stephen Read
  36. Memory:Schema Theory, A European Solution, Generalization hierarchies
  37. Memory:Superset Schemas, Part hierarchy, Slots Have More Schemas
  38. MEMORY:Representation of knowledge (continued), Memory for stories
  39. Memory:Representation of knowledge, PQ4R Method, Elaboration
  40. Memory:Study Methods, Analyze Story Structure, Use Multiple Modalities
  41. Memory:Mental Imagery, More evidence, Kosslyn yet again, Image Comparison
  42. Mental Imagery:Eidetic Imagery, Eidetic Psychotherapy, Hot and cold imagery
  43. Language and thought:Productivity & Regularity, Linguistic Intuition
  44. Cognitive development:Assimilation, Accommodation, Stage Theory
  45. Cognitive Development:Gender Identity, Learning Mathematics, Sensory Memory