ZeePedia

ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory

<< ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model
ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications >>
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Lesson 09
ATTENTION (continued)
Capacity Models
Psychologists have become more interested in capacity Demands of different tasks (Kahneman,
1973). Like there is information coming in and then goes to filter and only relevant information is
selected. Different tasks different demands attention diverted to one task to other task. Tasks
require mental effort. People may have some control over where the bottleneck occurs (Johnston
& Heinz, 1978)
Kahneman's Capacity Model
Attention and Effort" was a major work of kahneman (Kahneman, 1973). He shifted the focus
from bottleneck to capacity. There is flexibility in attention, like we can change our attention from
one thing to other thing. There is a lot of evidence that our bottle neck is actually adjustable and it
can be move early to late. A general limit on a person's capacity to perform mental work. A
person has considerable control over how this capacity is allocated.
Daniel Kahneman
He has been doing his work at Princeton University. He has been a pioneer
of cognitive psychology not only in the area of attention but on other areas.
Kahneman's Capacity Model
In this model there are many miscellaneous
determinants that impact sensory system.
Something happens that trigger arousal.
Arousal means some activity starts. Arousal
has many manifestations. Available capacity
of attention will be allocated depending on
the state of arousals. So there is allocation
policy.  Then  there  are  some  possible
activities. Like the amount of attention is paid
on a task. At the same time there is a
feedback loop. We evaluate how much
attention is needed for the task. Then we
readjust more capacity to that task.
The factors that have impact on allocation
policy are:
Arousal
A physiological state that influences the
distribution of mental capacity in the various
tasks.
Enduring Disposition
An automatic influence where people direct
their attention.
26
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
Monetary Intentions
A conscious decision to allocate attention to certain tasks or aspects of the environment.
Example: World Trade Centre
Boeing 707 flying in cloudy weather, at an altitude 200 feet below the top of the WTC was
reported by the airport controller. Alarm buzzed in the airport control tower to signal the danger.
The controller radioed the crew to turn around and climb up to 3000 feet. The controller was
monitoring seven other planes at the time. His attention was diverted to other planes so he could
not pay attention to that plane. So alarm diverted his attention toward that plane.
Bottleneck vs. Capacity
Both models predict that simultaneous activities are likely to interfere with each other. They
attribute the interference to different causes.
Bottleneck: according to this model same mechanism required to perform 2 incompatible tasks.
It is specific. It says same mechanism id needed to those tasks.
Capacity: Demands of 2 activities exceed available capacity then there is problem. It is non-
specific to the task. Total demands of the task, is an important variable.
Both kinds of interference occur (specific and capacity, early selection and late
selection.)
Both kinds of theories are necessary.
Capacity & Stage of Selection
All experiments are showing flexibility of attention. It means we can divert our
attention from one task to other task.
These are also showing an interaction between bottleneck & capacity theories
(Johnston & Heinz, 1978). Listener has control over the location of the bottleneck.
The location can vary from early mode of selection (before recognition) to late
mode of selection (after semantic analysis means meaning analysis).
There is a need to combine capacity model and stage of selection.
Multimode Theory
A theory that proposes that people's intentions and the demands of the task determine the
information processing stage at which information is selected.
Demands of task require greater mental efforts. People's intentions and the demands of task
decide where the attention is paid. We select on the basis of meanings if there are two competing
tasks.
Early Selection vs. Late Selection
27
img
Cognitive Psychology ­ PSY 504
VU
According to this theory both early and late selection can occur. Attention is flexible. We can
move our bottleneck and filter. But there must be interaction between bottleneck and capacity.
We can shift our bottleneck to the low level in information processing when we pay attention to
the physical properties of the task. We have a capacity to switch our bottle neck from early to late
or late to early. Late selection will affect the perception of primary message because more
information is selected about the secondary task.
28
Table of Contents:
  1. INTRODUCTION:Historical Background
  2. THE INFORMATION PROCESSING APPROACH
  3. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY:Brains of Dead People, The Neuron
  4. COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):The Eye, The visual pathway
  5. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY (CONTINUED):Hubel & Wiesel, Sensory Memory
  6. VISUAL SENSORY MEMORY EXPERIMENTS (CONTINUED):Psychological Time
  7. ATTENTION:Single-mindedness, In Shadowing Paradigm, Attention and meaning
  8. ATTENTION (continued):Implications, Treisman’s Model, Norman’s Model
  9. ATTENTION (continued):Capacity Models, Arousal, Multimode Theory
  10. ATTENTION:Subsidiary Task, Capacity Theory, Reaction Time & Accuracy, Implications
  11. RECAP OF LAST LESSONS:AUTOMATICITY, Automatic Processing
  12. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Experiment, Implications, Task interference
  13. AUTOMATICITY (continued):Predicting flight performance, Thought suppression
  14. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Template Matching Models, Human flexibility
  15. PATTERN RECOGNITION:Implications, Phonemes, Voicing, Place of articulation
  16. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Adaptation paradigm
  17. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Gestalt Theory of Perception
  18. PATTERN RECOGNITION (continued):Queen Elizabeth’s vase, Palmer (1977)
  19. OBJECT PERCEPTION (continued):Segmentation, Recognition of object
  20. ATTENTION & PATTERN RECOGNITION:Word Superiority Effect
  21. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Neural Networks, Patterns of connections
  22. PATTERN RECOGNITION (CONTINUED):Effects of Sentence Context
  23. MEMORY:Short Term Working Memory, Atkinson & Shiffrin Model
  24. MEMORY:Rate of forgetting, Size of memory set
  25. Memory:Activation in a network, Magic number 7, Chunking
  26. Memory:Chunking, Individual differences in chunking
  27. MEMORY:THE NATURE OF FORGETTING, Release from PI, Central Executive
  28. Memory:Atkinson & Shiffrin Model, Long Term Memory, Different kinds of LTM
  29. Memory:Spread of Activation, Associative Priming, Implications, More Priming
  30. Memory:Interference, The Critical Assumption, Limited capacity
  31. Memory:Interference, Historical Memories, Recall versus Recognition
  32. Memory:Are forgotten memories lost forever?
  33. Memory:Recognition of lost memories, Representation of knowledge
  34. Memory:Benefits of Categorization, Levels of Categories
  35. Memory:Prototype, Rosch and Colleagues, Experiments of Stephen Read
  36. Memory:Schema Theory, A European Solution, Generalization hierarchies
  37. Memory:Superset Schemas, Part hierarchy, Slots Have More Schemas
  38. MEMORY:Representation of knowledge (continued), Memory for stories
  39. Memory:Representation of knowledge, PQ4R Method, Elaboration
  40. Memory:Study Methods, Analyze Story Structure, Use Multiple Modalities
  41. Memory:Mental Imagery, More evidence, Kosslyn yet again, Image Comparison
  42. Mental Imagery:Eidetic Imagery, Eidetic Psychotherapy, Hot and cold imagery
  43. Language and thought:Productivity & Regularity, Linguistic Intuition
  44. Cognitive development:Assimilation, Accommodation, Stage Theory
  45. Cognitive Development:Gender Identity, Learning Mathematics, Sensory Memory