ZeePedia buy college essays online

Organization Development

<<< Previous Organization Process Approaches:Application Stages, Microcosm Groups Next >>>
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
Lesson 33
Organization Process Approaches
Now we will discuss system wide process interventions change programs directed at improving such
processes as organizational problem solving, leadership, visioning, and task accomplishment between
groups--for a major subsystem or for an entire organization.
The first type of intervention, the organization confrontation meeting, is among the earliest organization
wide process approaches. It helps mobilize the problem-solving resources of a major subsystem or whole
organization by encouraging members to identify and confront pressing issues.
The second organization process approach is called inter-group relations. It consists of two interventions:
the inter-group conflict resolution meeting and microcosm groups. Both interventions are aimed at
diagnosing and addressing important organizational level processes, such as conflict, the coordination of
organizational units, and diversity. The inter-group conflict intervention is specifically oriented toward
conflict processes, whereas the microcosm group is a more generic system wide change strategy.
A third system wide process approach, the large-group intervention, has received considerable attention
recently and is one of the fastest-growing areas in OD. Large-group interventions get a "whole system into
the room" and create processes that allow a variety of stakeholders to interact simultaneously. A large-
group intervention can be used to clarify important organizational values, develop new ways of looking at
problems, articulate a new vision for the organization, solve cross-functional problems, restructure
operations, or devise an organizational strategy. It is a powerful tool for addressing organizational problems
and opportunities and for accelerating the pace of organizational change.
The final is a normative approach to OD: Blake and Mouton's Grid Organization Development. It is a
popular intervention, particularly in large organizations. Grid OD is a packaged program that organizations
can purchase and train members to use. In contrast to modern contingency approaches, the Grid proposes
one best way to manage organizations. Consequently, OD practitioners increasingly have questioned its
applicability and effectiveness in contemporary organizations.
Organization Confrontation Meeting:
The confrontation meeting is an intervention designed to mobilize the resources of the entire organization
to identify problems, set priorities and action targets, and begins working on identified problems. Originally
developed by Beckhard, the intervention can be used at any time but is particularly useful when the
organization is in stress and when there is a gap between the top and the rest of the organization (such as
when a new top manager joins the organization). General Electric's Work-Out" program is a recent
example of how the confrontation meeting has been adapted to fit today's organizations. Although the
original model involved only managerial and professional people, it has since been used successfully with
technicians, clerical personnel, and assembly workers.
Application Stages:
The organization confrontation meeting typically involves the following steps:
1. A group meeting of all those involved is scheduled and held in an appropriate place. Usually the
task is to identity problems about the work environment and the effectiveness of the organization.
2. Groups are appointed representing all departments of the organization. Thus, each group might
have one or more members from sales, purchasing, finance, operations, and quality assurance. For
obvious reasons, a subordinate should not be in the same group as his or her boss, and top
management should form its own group. Group size can vary from five to fifteen members,
depending on such factors as the size of the organization and available meeting places.
3. The point is stressed that the groups are to be open and honest and to work hard at identifying
problems they see in the organization. No one will be criticized for bringing up problems and, in
fact, the groups will be judged on their ability to do so.
4. The groups are given an hour or two to identify organization problems. Generally, an OD
practitioner goes from group to group, encouraging openness and assisting the groups with their
5. The groups then reconvene in a central meeting place. Each group reports the problems it has
identified and sometimes offers solutions. Because each group hears the reports of all the others, a
maximum amount of information is shared.
6. Either then or later, the master list of problems is broken down into categories. This can be done
by the participants, by the person leading the session, or by the manager and his or her staff. This
process eliminates duplication and overlap and allows the problems to be separated according to
functional or other appropriate areas.
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
7. Following problem categorization, participants are divided into problem-solving groups whose
composition may, and usually does, differ from that of the original problem-identification groups.
For example, all operations problems may be handled by people in that subunit. Or task forces
representing appropriate cross sections of the organization may be formed.
8. Each group ranks the problems, develops a tactical action plan, and determines an appropriate
timetable for completing this phase of the process.
9. Each group then periodically reports its list of priorities and tactical plans of action to management
or to the larger group.
10. Schedules for periodic (frequently monthly) follow-up meetings are established. At these sessions,
the team leaders report either to top management, to the other team leaders, or to the group as a
whole regarding their team's progress and plans for future action. The formal establishment of
such follow-up meetings ensures both continuing action and the modification of priorities and
timetables as needed.
Inter-group Relations Interventions:
The ability to diagnose and understand inter-group relations is important for OD practitioners because (1)
groups often must work with and through other groups to accomplish their goals; (2) groups within the
organization often create problems and place demands on each other; and (3) the quality of the
relationships between groups can affect the degree of organizational effectiveness. Two OD
interventions--microcosm groups and inter-group conflict resolution--are described here. A microcosm
group uses members from several groups to help solve organization- wide problems. Inter-group issues are
explored in this context, and then solutions are implemented in the larger organization. Inter-group conflict
resolution helps two groups work out dysfunctional relationships. Together, these approaches help improve
inter-group processes and lead to organizational effectiveness.
Microcosm Groups:
A microcosm group consists of a small number of individuals who reflect the issue being addressed. For
example, a microcosm group composed of members representing a spectrum of ethnic backgrounds,
cultures, and races can be created to address diversity issues in the organization. This group, assisted by OD
practitioners, can create programs and processes targeted at specific problems. In addition to addressing
diversity problems, microcosm groups have been used to carry out organization diagnoses, solve
communications problems, integrate two cultures, smooth the transition to a new structure, and address
dysfunctional political processes.
Microcosm groups work through "parallel processes," which are the unconscious changes that take place in
individuals when two or more groups interact. After groups interact, members often find that their
characteristic patterns of roles and interactions change to reflect the roles and dynamics of the group with
whom they were relating. Put simply, groups seem to "infect" and become "infected" by the other groups.
The following example given by Alderfer helps to clarify how parallel processes work.
An organizational diagnosis team had assigned its members to each of five departments in a small
manufacturing company. Members of the team had interviewed each department head and several
department members, and had observed department meetings. The team was preparing to observe their
first meeting of department heads and was trying to anticipate the group's behavior. At first they seemed to
have no `rational" basis for predicting the top group's behavior because they "had no data" from direct
observation. They decided to role-play the group meeting they had never seen. Diagnostic team members
behaved as they thought the department heads would, and the result was uncanny. Team members found
that they easily became engaged with one another in the simulated department-head meeting; emotional
involvement occurred quickly for all participants. When the team actually was able to observe a
department-head meeting, they were amazed at how closely the simulated meeting had approximated the
actual session.
Thus, if a small and representative group can intimately understand and solve a complex organizational
problem for themselves; they are in a good position to recommended action to address the problem in the
larger system.
Application Stages
The process of using a microcosm group to address organization wide issues involves the following five
1. Identify an issue. This step involves finding a system wide problem to be addressed. This may result
from an organizational diagnosis or may be an idea generated by an organization member or task force. For
example, one microcosm group charged with improving organizational communications was started by a
division manager. He was concerned that the information provided by those reporting directly to him
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
differed from the data he received from informal conversations with people throughout the division.
2. Convene the group. Once an issue is identified, the microcosm group can be formed. The most
important convening principle is that group membership needs to reflect the appropriate mix of
stakeholders related to the issue. If the issue is organizational communication, then the group should
contain people from all hierarchical levels and function, including staff groups and unions, if applicable. If
the issue is integrating two corporate cultures following a merger, the microcosm group should contain
people from both organizations who understand their respective cultures. Following the initial setup, the
group itself becomes responsible for determining its membership. It will decide whether to add new
members and how to fill vacant positions.
Convening the group also draws attention to the issue and gives the group status. Members also need to be
perceived as credible representatives of the problem. This will increase the likelihood that organization
members will listen to and follow the suggestions they make.
3. Provide group training. Once the microcosm group is established, training is provided in group
problem solving and decision making. Team-building interventions also may be appropriate. Group
training focuses on establishing a group mission or charter, working relationships among members, group
decision- making norms, and definitions of the problem to be addressed.
From a group-process perspective, OD practitioners may need to observe and comment on how the group
develops. Because the group is a microcosm of the organization, it will tend, through its behavior and
attitudes, to reflect the problem in the larger organization. For example, if the group is addressing
communication problems in the organization, it is likely to have its own difficulties with communication.
Recognizing within the group the problem or issue it was formed to address is the first step toward solving
the problem in the larger system.
4. Address the issue. This step involves solving the problem and implementing solutions. OD
practitioners may help the group diagnose, design, implement, and evaluate changes. A key issue is gaining
commitment in the wider organization to implementing the group's solutions. The following factors can
facilitate such ownership. First, a communication plan should link group activities to the organization. This
may include publishing minutes from team meetings; inviting organization members, such as middle
managers, union representatives, or hourly workers, into the meetings; and making presentations to
different organizational groups. Second, group members need to be visible and accessible to management
and labor. This can ensure that the appropriate support and resources are developed for the
recommendations. Third, problem-solving processes should include an appropriate level of participation by
organization members. Different data collection methods can be used to gain member input
and to produce ownership of the problem and solutions.
5. Dissolve the group. The microcosm group can be disbanded following successful implementation of
changes. This typically involves writing a final report or holding a final meeting.
Large Group Interventions:
The third system wide process intervention is called large-group intervention. Such change programs have
been referred to variously as "search conferences," "open-space meetings," "open-systems planning," and
"future searches." They focus on issues that affect the whole organization or large segments of it, such as
developing new products or services, responding to environmental change, or introducing new technology.
The defining feature of large-group intervention is the bringing together large numbers of organization
members and other stakeholders, often more than one hundred, for a two- to four-day meeting or
conference. Here, conference attendees' work together to identify and resolve organization wide problems,
to design new approaches to structuring and managing the firm, or to propose future directions for the
organization.  Large-group  interventions  are  among  the  fastest-growing  OD  applications.
Large-group interventions can vary on several dimensions, including purpose, size, length, structure, and
number. The purpose of these change methods can range from solving particular organizational problems
to envisioning future strategic directions. Large-group interventions have been run with groups of less than
fifty to more than two thousand participants and have lasted between one and five days. Some large-group
processes are relatively planned and structured; others are more informal. Some interventions involve a
single large-group meeting; others include a succession of meetings to accomplish system wide change in a
short period of time.
Application Stages:
Conducting a large-group intervention generally involves preparing for the meeting, conducting it, and
following up on outcomes. These activities are described below.
Preparing for the Large-Group Meeting
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
A design team comprising OD practitioners and several organization members is formed to organize the
event. The team generally addresses three key ingredients for successful large-group meetings: a compelling
meeting  theme,  appropriate  participants,  and  relevant  tasks  to  address  the  theme.
1. Compelling meeting theme. Large-group interventions require a compelling reason or focal point for
change. Although "people problems" can be an important focus, more powerful reasons for large-group
efforts include managing impending mergers or reorganizations, responding to environmental threats and
opportunities, or proposing radical organizational changes. Whatever the focal point for change, senior
leaders need to make clear to others the purpose of the large-group meeting. Ambiguity about the reason
for the intervention can dissipate participants' energy and commitment to change. For example, a large-
group meeting that successfully envisioned a hospital's future organization design was viewed as a failure by
a few key managers who thought that the purpose was to cut costs from the hospital's budget. Their
subsequent lack of support stalled the change effort.
2. Appropriate participants. A fundamental goal of large-group interventions is to "get the whole system
in the room." This involves inviting as many people as possible who have a stake in the conference theme
and who are energized and committed to conceiving and initiating change. Senior managers, suppliers,
union leaders, internal and external customers, trade group representatives, government and regulatory
officials, and organization members from a variety of jobs, genders, races, and ages are potential
3. Relevant tasks to address the conference theme. As described below, these tasks typically are
assigned to several subgroups responsible for examining the theme and drawing conclusions for action.
Generally, participants rely on their own experience and expertise to address system wide Issues, rather
than drawing on resources from outside of the large-group meeting. This ensures that the meeting can be
completed within the allotted time and that members can participate fully as important sources of
Conducting the Meeting:
The flow of events in a large-group meeting can vary greatly, depending on its purpose and the framework
adopted. Most large-group processes, however, fit within two primary frameworks: open-systems methods
and open-space methods.
Open-Systems Methods:
A variety of large-group approaches, such as search conferences, open-systems planning, and real-time
strategic change, have their basis in open-systems methods. These approaches help organizations assess
their environments systematically and develop strategic responses to them. They help organization
members develop a strategic mission for relating to the environment and influencing it in favorable
directions, Open-systems methods begin with a diagnosis of the existing environment and how the
organization relates to it. They proceed to develop possible future environments and action plans to bring
them about. These steps are described below.
1. Map the current environment surrounding the organization. In this step, the different domains or
parts of the environment are identified and prioritized. This involves listing all external groups directly
interacting with the organization, such as customers, suppliers, or government agencies, and ranking them
in importance. Participants then are asked to describe each domain's expectations for the organization's
2. Assess the organization's responses to environmental expectations. This step asks participants to
describe how the organization currently addresses the environmental expectations identified in step 1
3. Identify the core mission of the organization. This step helps to identify the underlying purpose or
core mission of the organization, as derived from how it responds to external demands. Attention is
directed at discovering the mission as it is revealed in the organization's behavior, not as it is pronounced in
the organization's official statement of purpose. This is accomplished by examining the organization and
environment transactions identified in Steps 1 and 2 and then assessing the values that seem to underlie
those interactions. These values provide clues about the actual identity or mission of the organization.
4. Create a realistic future scenario of environmental expectations and organization responses. This
step asks members to project the organization and its environment into the near future, assuming no real
changes in the organization. It asks participants to address the question, "What will happen if the
organization continues to operate as it does at present?" Participant responses are combined to develop a
likely organization future under the assumption of no change.
5. Create an ideal future scenario of environmental expectations and organization responses.
Members are asked to create alternative desirable futures. This involves going back over steps 1, 2, and 3
and asking what members ideally would like to see happen in the near future in both the environment and
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
the  organization.  People  are  encouraged  to  fantasize  about  desired  futures  without
worrying about possible constraints.
6. Compare the present with the ideal future and prepare an action plan for reducing the
discrepancy. This last step identifies specific actions that will move both the environment and the
organization toward the desired future. Planning for appropriate interventions typically occurs in three
timeframes: tomorrow, six months from now, and two years from now. Participants also decide on a
follow- up schedule for sharing the flow of actions and updating the planning process.
There are a number of variations on this basic model, each of which follows a similar pattern of creating
common ground, discussing the issues, and devising an agenda for change. For example, search
conferences begin with an exercise called "appreciating the past," which asks participants to examine the
significant events, milestones, and highlights of the organization's previous thirty years (or less, in the case
of newer organizations). It demonstrates that participants share a common history, although they may
come  from  different  organizations,  departments,  age  groups,  or  hierarchical  levels.
Once common ground is established, members can discuss the system wide issue or theme. To promote
widespread participation, members typically organize into subgroups of eight to ten people representing as
many stakeholder viewpoints as possible. The subgroups may address a general question (for example,
"What are the opportunities for new business in our global market?") or focus on a specific issue (For
example, "How can we improve quality and cut costs on a particular product line?"). Subgroup members
brainstorm answers to these questions, record them on flipchart paper, and share them with the larger
group. The whole group compares responses from the subgroups and identifies common themes. Other
methods, such as presentations to the large group, small-group meetings on particular aspects of the
conference theme, or spontaneous meetings of interest to the participants, are used to discuss the
conference theme and distribute information to members.
The final task of large-group meetings based on open-systems methods is creating an agenda for change.
Participants are asked to reflect on what they have learned at the meeting and to suggest changes for
themselves, their department, and the whole organization. Members from the same department often are
grouped together to discuss their proposals and decide on action plans, timetables, and accountabilities.
Action items for the total organization are referred to a steering committee that addresses organization
wide policy issues and action plans. At the conclusion of the large-group meeting, the departmental
subgroups and the steering committee report their conclusions to all participants and seek initial
commitment to change.
Open-Space Methods. The second approach to large-group interventions is distinguished by its lack of
formal structure. Open-space methods temporarily restructure or "self-organize" participants around
interests and topics associated with the conference theme. They generally follow these steps:
1. Set the conditions for self-organizing. In the first step, the OD practitioner or manager responsible
for the large-group intervention sets the stage by announcing the theme of the session and the norms that
will govern it. In addition, participants are informed that the meeting will consist of small-group discussions
convened by the participants and addressing any topic they believe critical to the theme of the conference.
Two sets of norms govern how open-space methods are applied, and although the norms may sound
ambiguous, they are critical to establishing the conditions for a successful meeting.
The first set of norms concerns the "Law of Two Feet." It encourages people to take' responsibility for
their own behavior; to go to meetings and discussions where they are learning, contributing, or in some way
remaining interested. Moving from group to group is legitimized by the roles of "butterflies" and
"bumblebees." Butterflies attract others into spontaneous conversations and, in fact, may never attend a
formal meeting. Bumblebees go from group to group and sprinkle knowledge, information, or new ideas
into different meetings.
The second set of norms is labeled the "Four Principles." The first principle is "whoever comes is the right
people." It is intended to free people to begin conversations with anyone at any time. It also signals that the
quality of a conversation is what's most important, not who's involved. The second principle, "Whatever
happens is the only thing that could have," infuses the group with responsibility, encourages participants to
be flexible, and prepares them to be surprised. "Whenever it starts is the right time" is the third principle
and is aimed at encouraging creativity and following the natural energy in the group. The final principle,
"When it is over, it is over," allows people to move on and not feel like they have to meet for a certain time
period or satisfy someone else's requirements.
2. Create the agenda. The second step in Open-Space interventions is to develop a road map for the
remainder of the conference. This is accomplished by asking participants to describe a topic related to the
conference theme that they have passion for and interest in discussing. This topic is written on a large piece
of paper, announced to the group, and then posted on the community bulletin board where meeting topics
and locations are displayed. The person announcing the topic agrees to convene the meeting at the posted
time and place. This process continues until everyone who wants to define a topic has been given the
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
chance to speak. The final activity in this step asks participants to sign up for as many of the sessions as
they have interest in. The open-space meeting begins with the first scheduled sessions.
3. Coordinate activity through information. During an open-space session, there are two ways to
coordinate activities. First, each morning and evening a community meeting is held to announce new topics
that have emerged for which meeting dates and times have been assigned, or to share observations and
learning. Second, as the different meetings occur, the conveners produce one-page summaries of what
happened, who attended, what subjects were discussed, and what recommendations or actions were
proposed. Typically, this is done on computer in a room dedicated for this purpose. These summaries are
posted near the community bulletin board in an area often labeled "newsroom." Participants are
encouraged to visit the newsroom and become familiar with what other groups have been discussing. The
summaries also can be printed and copied for conference participants.
Following up of Meeting Outcomes:
Follow-up efforts are vital to implementing the action plans from large-scale interventions. These efforts
involve communicating the results of the meeting to the rest of the organization, gaining wider
commitment to the changes, and structuring the change process. In those cases where all the members of
the organization were involved in the large-group meeting, implementation can proceed immediately
according to the timetable included in the action plans.
Grid Organization Development: A Normative Approach
Grid OD, a change model is one of the most widely used approaches to system-wide planned change. This
process is a systematic approach aimed at achieving corporate excellence. It is believed that managers and
organizations can only be made more effective if the basic culture of the system is changed.
Grid OD starts with a focus on individual behavior, specifically on the managerial styles of executives,
called Managerial Grid. The program moves through a series of sequential phases involving the work team,
the relationships between groups or subunits, and finally the overall culture of the organization.
According to the Managerial Grid, an individual's style can be described according to his or her concern for
production and concern for people.
A concern for production covers a range of behaviors, such as accomplishing productive tasks, developing
creative ideas, making quality policy decisions, establishing thorough and high-quality staff services, or
creating efficient workload measurements. Concern for production is not limited to things but also may
involve human accomplishment within the organization, regardless of the assigned tasks or activities.
A concern for people encompasses a variety of issues, including concern for the individual's personal
worth, good working conditions, a degree of involvement or commitment to completing the job, security, a
fair salary structure and fringe benefits, and good social and other relationships.
Managers who have a low concern for production and a high concern for people view people's feelings,
attitudes, and needs as valuable in their own right. This type of manager strives to provide subordinates
with work conditions that provide ease, security, and comfort. On the other hand managers who have a
high concern for production but a low concern for people minimize the attitudes and feelings of
subordinates and give little attention to individual creativity, conflict, and commitment. As a result, the
focus is on the work organization.
Managerial style is the most effective in overcoming the communications barrier to corporate excellence.
The basic assumptions behind this managerial style differ qualitatively and quantitatively from those
underlying the other managerial styles, which assume there is an inherent conflict between the needs of the
organization and the needs of people. By showing a high concern for both people and production,
managers allow employees to think and to influence the organization, thus promoting active support for
organizational plans. Employee participation means that better communication is critical; therefore,
necessary information is shared by all relevant parties. Moreover, better communication means self-
direction and self-control, rather than unquestioning, blind obedience. Organizational commitment arises
out of discussion, deliberation, and debate over major organizational issues.
Application Stages:
Grid Organization Development has two key objectives: to improve planning by developing a strategy for
organizational excellence based on clear logic, and to help managers gain the necessary knowledge and skills
to supervise effectively. It consists of six phases designed to analyze an entire business and to overcome the
planning and communications barriers to corporate excellence.
Phase 1: The Grid Seminar
In this one-week program, participants analyze their personal styles on the Managerial Grid and learn team
methods of problem solving. Top management attends the seminar and then leads the next level of
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
management through a similar experience. In addition to assessing themselves using questionnaires and
case studies, participants receive feedback on their styles from other group members.
The learning objectives for the week include:
·  Learning the GRID in a way to analyze thinking.
·  Increasing one's personal objectivity in appraising oneself.
·  Achieving clear and candid communication.
·  Learning and working effectively in a team.
·  Learning to manage inter-group conflict.
·  Analyzing one's corporate work culture by applying the GRID framework.
·  Gaining an understanding of the phases of GRID OD.
Participants in the seminar analyze their own managerial approaches and learn alternative ways of
managing. In addition, they study methods of team action. They measure and evaluate team effectiveness in
solving problems with others. A high point of the seminar learning is reached when the participants critique
one another's styles of managerial performance. Another is when managers critique the dominant style of
their own organization's culture, its traditions, precedents, and past practices. A third is when participants
consider steps for increasing the effectiveness of the whole organization.
Phase 2: Teamwork Development:
Teamwork development begins with the organization's top manager and employees who report directly to
him or her. These people later attend another team meeting with their own subordinates. This continues
down through the entire organization.
During this session the team deals with subjects directly relevant to their daily operations and behaviors.
Before the conclusion of the week, the team sets group and individual goals.
Phase 3: Inter-group Development:
Although an organization may have various sections or units, each with specialized tasks and different
goals, it still must work as a whole if it is to achieve organizational excellence. A fair amount of inter-group
or interdepartmental conflict is present in most organizations. Each group builds negative stereotypes of
other groups, and this conflict can escalate easily into subtle or overt power struggles that result in win-lose
situations. Improving inter-group relations involves the following steps:
·  Before the sessions, each person prepares a written description of the actual working relationship,
as contrasted with the ideal relationship;
·  Each group isolates itself for several days to summarize its perceptions of the actual and ideal
·  The two groups meet and limit their interaction to comparing their perceptions via a spokesperson;
·  The two groups then work on making the relationship more productive. The action step is
completed when both groups have a clear understanding of the specific actions each group will
take and how those actions will be followed up.
Phase 4: Developing an Ideal Strategic Organization Model
The top managers in the organization now work toward achieving a model of organizational excellence,
incorporating six basic factors:
·  Clear definitions of minimum and optimum organizational financial objectives;
·  Clear, explicit definitions of the character and nature of organizational activities;
·  Clear operational definitions of the character and scope of markets, customers, or clients;
·  An organizational structure that integrates operations for synergistic results;
·  Basic policies for organizational decision making; and
·  Approaches  to  implement  growth  capacity  and  avoid  stagnation  or  obsolescence.
Phase 5: Implementing the Ideal Strategic Model
The Grid OD program has an implementation model that can be adapted to any organization.
Organizations can be divided into identifiable segments, such as products, profit centers, or geographical
·  The top management team assigns one planning team to each segment.
·  Because the units cannot be completely autonomous, one corporate headquarters team and a
coordinator must be established.
Organization Development ­ MGMT 628
Finally, the planning coordinator and the corporate headquarter team need to ensure that the
implementation plan is understood clearly.
Phase 6: Systematic Critique:
The systematic critique determines the degree of organization excellence after Phase 5 compared with
measurements taken before Phase 1. The basic instrument is a 100-question survey investigating behavior,
teamwork, inter-group relations, and corporate strategy. With instruments administered at each phase, it is
possible to observe the degree of change and gain insight into the total process of change. Because change
never ceases, discovery sets the stage for a new beginning.
Table of Contents:
  1. The Challenge for Organizations:The Growth and Relevance of OD
  2. OD: A Unique Change Strategy:OD consultants utilize a behavioral science base
  3. What an “ideal” effective, healthy organization would look like?:
  4. The Evolution of OD:Laboratory Training, Likert Scale, Scoring and analysis,
  5. The Evolution of OD:Participative Management, Quality of Work Life, Strategic Change
  6. The Organization Culture:Adjustment to Cultural Norms, Psychological Contracts
  7. The Nature of Planned Change:Lewin’s Change Model, Case Example: British Airways
  8. Action Research Model:Termination of the OD Effort, Phases not Steps
  9. General Model of Planned Change:Entering and Contracting, Magnitude of Change
  10. The Organization Development Practitioner:External and Internal Practitioners
  11. Creating a Climate for Change:The Stabilizer Style, The Analyzer Style
  12. OD Practitioner Skills and Activities:Consultant’s Abilities, Marginality
  13. Professional Values:Professional Ethics, Ethical Dilemmas, Technical Ineptness
  14. Entering and Contracting:Clarifying the Organizational Issue, Selecting an OD Practitioner
  15. Diagnosing Organizations:The Process, The Performance Gap, The Interview Data
  16. Organization as Open Systems:Equifinality, Diagnosing Organizational Systems
  17. Diagnosing Organizations:Outputs, Alignment, Analysis
  18. Diagnosing Groups and Jobs:Design Components, Outputs
  19. Diagnosing Groups and Jobs:Design Components, Fits
  20. Collecting and Analyzing Diagnostic information:Methods for Collecting Data, Observations
  21. Collecting and Analyzing Diagnostic information:Sampling, The Analysis of Data
  22. Designing Interventions:Readiness for Change, Techno-structural Interventions
  23. Leading and Managing Change:Motivating Change, The Life Cycle of Resistance to Change
  24. Leading and managing change:Describing the Core Ideology, Commitment Planning
  25. Evaluating and Institutionalizing Organization Development Interventions:Measurement
  26. Evaluating and Institutionalizing Organization Development Interventions:Research Design
  27. Evaluating and Institutionalizing Organization Development Interventions
  28. Interpersonal and Group Process Approaches:Group Process
  29. Interpersonal and Group Process Approaches:Leadership and Authority, Group Interventions
  30. Interpersonal and Group Process Approaches:Third-Party Interventions
  31. Interpersonal and Group Process Approaches:Team Building, Team Building Process
  32. Interpersonal and Group Process Approaches:Team Management Styles
  33. Organization Process Approaches:Application Stages, Microcosm Groups
  34. Restructuring Organizations:Structural Design, Process-Based Structures
  35. Restructuring Organizations:Downsizing, Application Stages, Reengineering
  36. Employee Involvement:Parallel Structures, Multiple-level committees
  37. Employee Involvement:Quality Circles, Total Quality Management
  38. Work Design:The Engineering Approach, Individual Differences, Vertical Loading
  39. Performance Management:Goal Setting, Management by Objectives, Criticism of MBO
  40. Developing and Assisting Members:Career Stages, Career Planning, Job Pathing
  41. Developing and Assisting Members:Culture and Values, Employee Assistance Programs
  42. Organization and Environment Relationships:Environmental Dimensions, Administrative Responses
  43. Organization Transformation:Sharing the Vision, Three kinds of Interventions
  44. The Behavioral Approach:The Deep Assumptions Approach
  45. Seven Practices of Successful Organizations:Training, Sharing Information