ZeePedia

LIGHT EMITTERS:Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), Solid State Semiconductor Lasers

<< LIGHT DETECTORS:The Silicon PIN Photodiode, Active Area, Response Time
LIGHT SYSTEMS CONFIGURATIONS:Opposed Configuration, Diffuse Reflective Configuration >>
img
Chapter Three
LIGHT EMITTERS
Introduction to Light Emitters
Unlike the limited number of useable light detectors, there is a wide variety of light emitters that
you can use for optical through-the-air communications. Your communications system will depend
much more on the type of light source used than on the light detector. You should choose the light
source based on the type of information that needs to be transmitted and the distance you wish cover
to reach the optical receiver. In all cases the light source must be modulated (usually turned on and
off or varied in intensity) to transmit information.
The modulation rate will determine the
maximum  rate  information  can  be
transmitted. You may have to make some
tradeoffs between the modulation rates
needed, the distance to be covered and the
amount of money you wish to spend.
Many light sources listed below are useful
for low to medium speed modulation rates
and can have ranges up to several miles. A
few others are ideal for low speed
telemetry transmission that can reach
beyond 50 miles. If you need high speed
Samples of Emitters
information transmission, there are only a
few choices, and those tend to be expensive. But, as the technology improves the prices should
come down. I have also described some of the latest devices that may become available to the
experimenter in a few years, but only demonstration devices exist today.
Light Emitting Diodes (LEDS)
For most through-the-air communications applications the infrared light emitting diode (IRLED) is
the most common choice. Although visible light emitting devices do exist, the infrared parts are
generally chosen for their higher efficiency and more favorable wavelength, especially when used
with silicon photodiode light detectors.
GaAlAs IR LED
GaAlAs (gallium, aluminum arsenic) infrared LEDs are the most widely used modulated IR light
sources. They have moderate electrical to optical efficiencies, (at low currents 4%), and produce
light that matches the common silicon PIN detector response curve (900nm). Most devices can be
pulsed at high current levels, as long as the average power does not exceed the manufacturer's
maximum power dissipation specification (typically 0.25 watts). Some devices can be pulsed up to
10 amps, if the duty cycle (ratio of on time to the time between pulses) is less than 0.2% (0.002:1
ratio). Some of the faster devices have response times that allow them to be driven with current
Page 23 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
pulses as short as 100 nanoseconds but
most  devices  require  at  least  900
nanoseconds. At a current level of about 6
amps a quality device can emit about 0.15
watts of infrared light. However, at higher
current levels their efficiency is generally
poor, dropping to less than 0.5% (See
Figures 3a, 3b, 3c and 3d.) Many
resemble the commonly used visible LEDs
and will typically be packaged in molded
plastic assemblies that have small 3/16"
lenses at the end. The position of the
actual LED chip within the package will
determine the divergence (spreading out)
of the exiting light. The typical T-1 3/4
Figure 3a
style device will have a half angle divergence ranging from 15 to 40 degrees. They are low cost,
medium speed (up to 1 million pulses per second) sources, with long operating lifetimes (typically
greater than 100,000 hours).
They are a good choice for short and
medium distance control links and general
communications applications. When used
with a large lens, a single device can be
used for a communications system with a
multi-mile range. Multi-device arrays can
also be constructed to transmit information
over wider areas or longer distances. They
generally cost between $0.30 to $2.00 each
and
are
available
from
many
manufacturers.
GaAs IR LED
These devices are the older and less
efficient cousin to the GaAlAs devices.
They come in all styles and shapes. The
more useful devices have smaller emitting
surfaces than GaAlAs LED's, permitting
narrow divergence angles with small
Figure 3b
lenses. Also, the small emitting areas make
them very useful for fiber optic applications. Some commercial devices have miniature lenses
cemented directly to the semiconductor chip to produce a small exiting light angle (divergence
angle). In conjunction with a small lens (typically 0.5") such devices can launch light with a narrow
divergence angle (0.5 degrees). The most important feature of the GaAs LED is its speed. They are
generally 10 times faster than GaAlAs LED's but many only produce 1/6 as much light. They are
often picked when medium speed transmission over short distances is required. Their price is
typically a little more than the GaAlAs LED's, even though they use an older technology. They will
cost between $2.00 to $25.00.
Page 24 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
GaAsP Visible Red LEDs
Although not as efficient as the infrared
devices some visible red LEDs (Figure
3d-1)are now available, that might find
limited use in some short range through-
the-air applications. Some so called "super
bright" LEDs boast high light output.
However, even the brightest components
will still produce only 1/3 as much light as
a quality infrared part.
Also, since their light is a visible red color,
an automatic 2:1 penalty will be paid when
the devices are used with a standard
silicon detector that has a weaker response
to red light. The visible red LEDs are
generally faster (up to 2 million pulses per
second) than IR components and can
therefore be used for medium speed
Figure 3c
applications. Also, since their light is
visible, they are much easier to align than invisible IR devices, especially when the devices are used
with lenses.
Solid State Semiconductor Lasers
GaAs (Hetrojunction) Lasers
These devices have been around since the
1960s and can produce very powerful light
pulses. Some devices are able to launch
light pulses in excess of 20 watts, which is
some 200 times more powerful than a
typical GaAlAs LED. But, these devices
can only be driven with duty cycles, less
than 0.1% (off time must be 1000 times
longer than on time). Also, their maximum
pulse width must be kept short (typically
less than 200 nanoseconds) even under
low pulse rate applications. However,
despite their limitations these devices can
be used in some voice transmitter systems
if some careful circuit designs are used.
As in most semiconductor lasers, the GaAs
laser does require a minimum current level
Figure 3d
(typically 10 to 20 amps) before it begins
emitting useable light. Such high operating currents demand more complicated drive circuits.
Despite a 10:1 sensitivity reduction, caused by the rather narrow emitted pulses (see receiver circuit
discussion), the more powerful light pulses available from GaAs lasers can increase the useful range
of a communications system by a factor of about 3, over a typical transmitter using a single LED. In
Page 25 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
addition, since their emitting spot sizes are
very small, they can also be focused into
very tight beams using rather small lenses.
In addition, since their spectral widths are
very narrow the matching light detector
circuit can use an optical band pass filter
to reduce the noise levels associated with
ambient light (see receiver circuit section).
For  low  speed  and  long  distance
applications, the GaAs laser should be
considered. However, they do have some
disadvantages. They typically cost much
more than a GaAlAs LED (up to $75).
They have shorter lifetimes (may only last
a few hundred hours) and are sensitive to
Figure 3d-1
temperature. Therefore, they require a carefully designed transmitter circuit that can switch 20 or
more amps at high speeds and can compensate for changes in operating temperature.
GaAlAs (CW) Lasers
These are the latest in infrared light emitting semiconductor devices and are rapidly maturing. The
first wide spread application for these devices was in audio compact disk players and CD-
ROM computer disk drives. They are also
being used in some computer laser
printers, bar code readers and FAX
machines. They have very small emitting
areas, can produce peak power levels in
excess of 0.2 watts and have narrow
spectral bandwidths (see Figure 3e.) The
most important improvement over other
light sources is that they can be modulated
at frequencies measured in gigahertz.
However, as in any new technology they
are still rather expensive. Low power units
that emit less than 0.01 watts of 880nm
infrared light, sell for about $20.00. Some
of the more powerful devices can cost as
Figure 3e
much as $20,000 each. Although the use of a laser in a communications system might give a project
a high tech sound, a much cheaper IR LED will almost always out-perform a low power laser
(typical LED will be able to emit 10 times more light at 1/10 the cost) in low to medium speed
applications. But, when very high-speed modulation rates (up to 1 billion pulses per second) are
needed, these devices would be a good choice.
Although expensive now, these devices should come down in price over the next few years. They
will also most likely be available at higher power levels too. But, until then, their advantages do not
justify their expense and the more useful high power units are beyond the reach of practical
experimental designs. I suggest using these devices only when necessary.
Page 26 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
Surface Emitting Lasers (VCSEL)
These devices are just now beginning to appear in some catalogs. Many companies have been
experimenting with these latest semiconductor devices since about 1988. Their small size and high
efficiency make them very suitable for some applications. They are mostly used in optical fiber
communications. Instead of being grown as single chip emitters, these devices are fabricated into
large arrays of very small individual laser sources sharing a common substrate. Since the individual
laser diode emitters can be as small as one micron (1/10,000cm) as many as 100 million separate
devices could be placed into a 1cm X 1cm area.
The output efficiency (electrical power to light power) has been reported to be about 40%, with
each tiny device emitting about 0.003 watts. Although each device may emit only a small amount of
light, when used as an array, 100 million such devices could launch some 100,000 watts of IR light
from about 200,000 watts of electricity. Of course, cooling such a powerful array would be a real
challenge, if not impossible. But, perhaps smaller arrays could be placed into common
semiconductor packages for easy mounting and cooling. Maybe a 0.1-watt device would be placed
into inexpensive LED style packages. Other devices may be mounted in better heat conducting
metal packages to allow perhaps 100 watts of light to be emitted. Since their maximum modulation
rates have been measured in the multi-billion pulses per second rate, surface-emitting lasers would
be ideal for many future through-the-air communications applications. They would especially be
useful in broadcasting optical information over a citywide area, where very powerful high-speed
light sources are needed. A 10,000-watt source, emitting light in a specially shaped 360-degree
pattern, might be able to transmit information over an area covering some 500 square miles. Such a
broadcasting system might be used to transmit library type information from large centralized
databases.
Externally Excited Solid State Lasers
Some of the very first lasers made were the Ruby and YAG lasers. Most of these lasers are excited
externally using large xenon flash tubes that are positioned around the central glass laser rod. A
small portion of the light from the xenon flash excites the specially positioned rod material, forming
short coherent light pulses. Although these lasers are capable of emitting very power light pulses,
with very narrow divergence angles, they are generally much too expensive and too complicated for
the average experimenter. They would therefore find very limited use in earth-bound optical
communications. However, some scientists believe that the extremely powerful light pulses that
these devices are capable of producing, might be useful in transmitting information into very deep
space. Since some pulsed lasers have been reported to launch light pulses approaching one terawatt
(1000 billion watts), low speed communications might be possible to a range of several light years
(one light year = 6 trillion miles). Such a feat would be very difficult to accomplish with microwave
techniques.
Gas Lasers
Helium-neon, carbon dioxide and argon are the more common types of gas lasers. The light emitted
from a gas arc, inside a glass tube, is bounced back and forth through the excited gas using specially
fabricated mirrors. A portion of the light is allowed to escape through one of the mirrors and
emerges as very monochromatic (one wavelength) and highly coherent (same phase) light. Such
lasers have narrow divergence angles (typically less than 0.1 degrees) but have very low conversion
efficiencies (much less than 0.1%). They are also expensive and bulky that makes them impractical
for most optical communications applications. Some published designs that did provide
experimental optical communications using helium-neon lasers were designed to transmit voice
Page 27 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
audio information over a range of only a few miles. The modulation technique was to vary the gas
arc current that then produced a light intensity modulation. However, the extra cost and relative low
power that resulted usually did not warrant the trouble. A properly designed system using a single
LED will usually out perform any short-range helium-neon laser communications system at a
fraction of the cost.
Although too expensive for the experimenter, some gas lasers have been used by the military for
many years. In particular, carbon dioxide lasers, that emit long infrared wavelengths (10,000
nanometers), have been used in some military targeting systems. The long infrared wavelength can
penetrate smoke and fog better than visible or near IR lasers. Also, the Navy has been
experimenting with some blue-green laser light to attempt to provide communications to
submarines deep under water. But, overall gas lasers fall short of the ideal for practical through-the-
air communications.
Fluorescent Light Sources
Fluorescent Lamps
Fluorescent lamps work on the principle of
"fluorescence" and because of their low
cost
have
many
through-the-air
applications. An electrical current passed
through a mercury vapor inside a glass
tube causes the gas discharge to emit
ultraviolet "UV" light. The UV light
causes a mixture of phosphors, painted on
the inside wall of the tube, to glow at a
number of visible light wavelengths (see
Figure 3f.) The electrical to optical
conversion  efficiency  of  these  light
sources is fairly good, with about 3 watts
of electricity required to produce about 1
watt of light. A cathode electrode at each
Figure 3f
end of the lamp that is heated by the discharge current, aids in maintaining the discharge efficiency,
by providing rich electron sources. By turning on and off the electrical discharge current, the light
being emitted by the phosphor, can be modulated. Also, by driving the tubes with higher than
normal currents and at low duty cycles, a fluorescent lamp can be forced to produce powerful light
pulses. However, like the pulse techniques used with LEDs, the fluorescent lamp pulsing techniques
must use short pulse widths to avoid destruction of the lamp.
To modulate a fluorescent lamp to transmit useful information, the negative resistance characteristic
of the mercury vapor discharge within the lamp must be dealt with. This requires the drive circuit to
limit the current through the tube. The two heated cathode electrodes of most lamps also require the
use of alternating polarity current pulses to avoid premature tube darkening. The typical household
fluorescent lighting uses an inductive ballast method to limit the lamp current. Although such a
method is efficient, the inductive current limiting scheme slows the rise and fall times of the
discharge current through the tube and thus produces longer then desired light pulses. To achieve a
short light pulse emission, a resistive current limiting scheme seems to work better. In addition,
there seems to be a relationship between tube length and the maximum modulation rate. Long tubes
do not respond as fast as shorter tubes. As an example, a typical 48" 40 watt lamp can be modulated
Page 28 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
up to about 10,000 pulses per second, but
some miniature 2" tubes can be driven up
to 200,000 pulses per second. The main
factor that ultimately limits the modulation
speed is the response time of the phosphor
used inside the lamp. Most visible
phosphors will not allow pulsing much
faster than about 500,000 pulses per
second. The visible light emitted by the
typical "cool white" lamp is also not ideal
when used with a silicon photodiode.
However, some special infrared light
emitting phosphors could be used to
increase the relative power output from a
fluorescent lamp, which may also produce
Figure 3g
faster response times. (see Figure 3g.)
If a conventional "cool white" lamp is used, a 2:1 power penalty will be paid due to the broad
spectrum of visible light being emitted (see Figure 3f.) This results since the visible light does not
appear as bright to a silicon light detector as IR light (see section on light detectors). Also, light
detectors with built-in visible filters should not be used, since they would not be sensitive to the
large amount of visible light emitted by the lamps. Although the average fluorescent lamp is not an
ideal light source, the relative low cost and the large emitting surface area make it ideal for
communications applications requiring light to be broadcasted over a wide area. Experiments
indicate that about 20 watts of light can be launched from some small 9-watt lamps at voice
frequency pulse rates (10,000/sec). Such power levels would require about 100 IR LEDs to
duplicate. But, the large surface emitting areas of fluorescent lamps makes them impractical for
long-range applications, since the light could not be easily collected and directed into a tight beam.
(For additional information see section on fluorescent lamp transmitter/receiver circuits.)
Cathode Ray Tubes (CRT)
CRTs work somewhat like fluorescent lamps, since they too use fluorescence emission techniques.
Electrons, emitted from a heated cathode end of the cathode ray vacuum tube, are accelerated
toward the anode end by the force of a high voltage applied between the cathode and anode
electrodes. Before hitting the anode screen, the electrons are forced to pass through a phosphor
painted onto the inside of the screen. In response to the high-speed electrons, the phosphor emits
light at various wavelengths. A voltage applied to a special metal grid near the tube's cathode end is
used to modulate the electron beam and can thus produce a modulation in the emitted light. This
principle is used in most computer and TV screens. Since the electron beam can be modulated at
very high rates, the light source modulation rate is limited only by the response time of the
phosphor used. Depending on the type of phosphor, the electrical to optical efficiency can be as
high as 10%. Some specially made cathode ray tubes produce powerful broad (unfocused) electron
beams that illuminate the entire front screen of the CRT instead of a small dot. Such tubes can yield
powerful light sources, with large flat emitting areas. A variation on the usual television type CRT
design positions a curved phosphor screen at the back of the vacuum tube and places the cathode
electrode at the front or side of a clear glass screen (some portable Sony TVs use such CRTs). This
technique increases the overall efficiency, since it allows the light from the phosphor to exit from
the same side as the electron source. With the aid of external cooling, such techniques could create
Page 29 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
very powerful light sources that might be able to launch tens of thousands of watts of light, pulsed
at rates exceeding tens of millions of light pulses per second. Although the typical experimenter
may not be interested in such light power levels it does raise some interesting possibilities for use in
city wide optical communications.
Gas Discharge Sources
Xenon Gas Discharge Tubes
The most common form of this class of
light source is the electronic camera flash.
These devices are some of the most
intense light sources available to the
experimenter and have many interesting
applications. The discharge lamps are
typically made from a glass tube with a
metal electrode installed at each end. They
are filled with xenon gas at about one
atmosphere of pressure (14psi). The gas
inside the tube can be made to glow with
very high intensity when an electrical
current is passed through it.
Xenon Lamps
As illustrated in Figure 3h, the xenon arc
emits light over a broad spectrum with some large peaks in the near infrared range. The electrical to
optical conversion is fairly good. A typical camera flash can produce about 2,000 watts of light
from about 10,000 watts of electrical power (20% efficiency). Some specially made discharge tubes
can generate flashes that exceed one million watts of light power. As in fluorescent lamps, the
minimum flash duration is somewhat dependent on the length of the discharge tube. A typical
camera flash tube has an electrode gap of about 15mm (0.6") and will usually produce a flash,
which lasts about one millisecond. The energy used to produce the short flash comes from
discharging a special capacitor, charged to
several hundred volts. By decreasing the
size of the capacitor (say to 6 microfarads)
and increasing the voltage (say to 300
volts) the camera flash tube can be made
to produce flashes as short as 20
microseconds. Shorter discharge flashes
are only possible by using specially made
discharge tubes with very narrow electrode
gaps (0.5mm). These narrow gap lamps
can produce flashes as short as one half
microsecond. However, the physics of the
xenon gas arc prevents flashes much
shorter.
Figure 3h
Flash rates up to 10,000 per second are
possible with the short gap lamps, but the typical camera flash tube can't be pulsed much faster than
about 100 flashes per second. Since some special high speed lamps can dissipate up to 75 watts of
average power, it is possible to design an optical voice information transmitter which could launch
Page 30 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
as much as 1000 watts of light with a narrow divergence. Such a transmitter would certainly have
some long-range possibilities. However, most xenon discharge lamps are more useful for low speed
and long-range applications, requiring very powerful light pulses. Many years ago, I constructed a
demonstration telemetry system that launched very powerful light pulses at a low data rate that had
a useable range of 50 miles. (See discussion on long-range telemetry transmitters using xenon flash
sources.)
Nitrogen Gas (air) Sparks
For very powerful and very short light pulse applications, a simple electrical spark in air can be
used. Some simple systems use two closely spaced (0.5mm) electrodes (usually made of
tungsten) in open air. With sufficient
voltage, the air between the electrodes can
be made to ionize briefly, forming a small
spark. Some gas barbecue grill igniters
that use piezoelectric crystals to produce
the needed high voltage, can be modified
to  produce  useful  sparks  for  some
experiments. Commercially made nitrogen
spark sources claim to generate light
flashes that pack about 100,000 watts of
light power into short 5 nanosecond
pulses.
The nitrogen (air) arc emits a broad
Figure 3i
spectrum of light with large peaks in the
visible blue and invisible ultraviolet (see Figure 3i.) Such a spectrum is not ideal when used with
silicon detectors. But the small emission areas of the sparks allow simple lenses or mirrors to be
used to form very tight divergence angles. But, the air ionization (sparking) can be become very
unstable at high pulse rates, without using specially made discharge tubes and drive circuits.
Therefore, the sparks are best used for powerful, very short pulse applications that demand only low
pulse rates. Optical radar, electronic distance measurements, air turbulence monitors and wind shear
analysis are some possible uses for such a light source. You shouldn't be fooled by the seemingly
dim appearance of these light emitters. To our human eyes the tiny flashes may not seem very
bright, but to a fast detector they can be very powerful. However, to take advantage of these unique
pulses, a fast light detector and an equally fast amplifier must be used. Since few experiments have
been conducted with these unique light sources, it is a great area for the experimenter to see what
can be done.
Other Gas Discharge Sources
Glass discharge tubes filled with Cesium, Krypton or Rubidium will all produce lots of infrared
light. Krypton behaves much like Xenon and has a very similar emission output. Cesium and
Rubidium are both semi-liquids at room temperatures and can be operated under high or low
pressures in a discharge lamp. Such lamps might be constructed in a similar manner to the more
common yellow color sodium vapor street lamp. Cesium, in particular, appears to be a good
candidate for some experimentation in developing some powerful light sources with high peak
power outputs. Since kilowatt size sodium vapor street lamps are being manufactured, perhaps
similar lamps using cesium could be made. Such lamps might be able to produce multi-kilowatts of
modulated infrared light using pulse methods.
Page 31 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE
img
External Light Modulators
Ferroelectric light valves, modulated mirror arrays, piezoelectric shutters, Kerr cells, Pockels cells,
Bragg cells and liquid crystals are all light modulators. They can be used to intensity modulate light
being emitted by an external source as it passes through them or reflects off them. The light can
originate from incandescent lamps, CW xenon gas arc lamps, light from a gas laser or even focused
sunlight. Although usually very expensive, some of the devices can be used to produce powerful
modulated light signals at high pulse rates.
Liquid crystal modulators are perhaps the slowest of the group. Most can't be driven much faster
than about 100 flashes per second. Ferroelectric light valves and piezoelectric shutters are a little
faster and can be pushed to perhaps 10,000 flashes per second. Kerr cells, Bragg cells and Pockel
cells, on the other hand, are known to be very fast. However, they work best when used with laser
light at a specific wavelength and at narrow angles. Some of these devices can modulate the light
from a laser at rates beyond 100 million pulses per second. But, most of these devices are very
expensive, are complicated and are therefore impractical for the average experimenter.
A new device developed by Texas
Instruments  (Figure  3j)  has  some
interesting possibilities. The technology
was originally developed for flat panel
computer and TV displays, but the
techniques might be useful for optical
communications. TI's process fabricates a
large array of very small mirrors that can
be moved using a voltage difference
between the mirror and an area behind the
mirror. Like tiny fans, each mirror would
wave back and forth in response to the
drive voltage. Because the mirrors are very
small, the modulation rates might be
pushed to perhaps 100,000 activations per
second. If the mirrors were used to reflect
light from an intense light emitter, a nice
source of modulated light could be
Figure 3j
produced.
Page 32 of 68
Optical Through-the-Air Communications Handbook -David A. Johnson, PE