ZeePedia

INTERNET USAGE IN FEATURE WRITING:Be very careful, Website checklist

<< SOURCES OF MATERIAL:Commemorations, Science and Technology
WHAT MAKES A GOOD FEATURE?:Meeting demands of readers >>
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
LESSON 03
INTERNET USAGE IN FEATURE WRITING
No doubt, the Internet has become a huge and valuable source of information for most of the writers, and
people tend to use it more considering the fact that, as they say, it is just a click away. It is one of the most
easily available sources of information to almost everyone at the fastest pace, and it has become hub of
information, which is growing at a fast pace. Due to this reason, the Internet is considered to be the easiest
way of information, and in abundance, surely too.
But for quite a few professionals, it is neither the easiest one nor a straight knowledge, as there are a huge
number of issues to be tackled; otherwise the information gathered can be contentious, controversial,
prejudiced and biased because there are a lot of knowledge bases, which are making them so.
The World Wide Web offers information and data from all over the world. Because so much information
is available, and because that information can appear to be fairly "anonymous", it is necessary to develop
skills to evaluate what you find. When you use a research or academic library, the books, journals and
other resources have already been evaluated by scholars, publishers and librarians. Every resource you
find has been evaluated in one way or another before you ever see it. When you are using the World Wide
Web, none of this applies. There are no filters. Because anyone can write a Web page, documents of the
widest range of quality, written by authors of the widest range of authority, are available on an even
playing field. Excellent resources reside along side the most dubious. The Internet epitomises the concept
of Caveat lector: Let the reader beware.
However, it never means that you should not use it. There are certain issues, which must be tackled by the
journalists, especially from developing countries, like ours.
The purpose of the discussion is to making the usage of the Internet more judicious sans making it
contentious, as the gathering of the information from any dubious source or website can make the write-
up both controversial and unreliable. Hence the idea is to get the `Right kind of material from the right
sources' by clearly identifying the subject, and authenticity of the sources.
Rationale for Evaluating What You Find on the Web
The World Wide Web can be a great place to accomplish research on many topics. But putting documents
or pages on the web is easy, cheap or free, unregulated, and unmonitored. There is a famous Steiner
cartoon published in the New Yorker (July 5, 1993) with two dogs sitting before a terminal looking at a
computer screen; one says to the other 'On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog.' The great wealth that
the Internet has brought to so much of society is the ability for people to express themselves, find one
another, exchange ideas, discover possible peers worldwide they never would have otherwise met, and,
through hypertext links in web pages, suggest so many other people's ideas and personalities to anyone
who comes and clicks. There are some real 'dogs' out there, but there's also great treasure.
Therein lies the rationale for evaluating carefully whatever you find on the Web. The burden is on you -
the reader - to establish the validity, authorship, timeliness, and integrity of what you find. Documents can
easily be copied and falsified or copied with omissions and errors -- intentional or accidental. In the
general World Wide Web there are no editors (unlike most print publications) to proofread and 'send it
back' or 'reject it' until it meets the standards of a publishing house's reputation. Most pages found in
general search engines for the web are self-published or published by businesses small and large with
motives to get you to buy something or believe a point of view. Even within university and library web
sites, there can be many pages that the institution does not try to oversee. The web needs to be free like
that!! And you, if you want to use it for serious research, need to cultivate the habit of healthy scepticism,
of questioning everything you find with critical thinking.
Internet as a very sophisticated propagandist
Various anti-religion and anti-Pakistan websites are there, and being a Pakistani journalist, one must
avoid those. Moreover, various groups have their own websites to propagate their own ideologies, which
has also become an `Infectious Enthusiasm' where everyone is trying to match the other. Hence it is
resulting in more biased and prejudiced material.
9
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
On the other hand, blogs, websites are there by immaturish and biased contributors, and special interest
groups, and Non-Governmental Organisations.
Scepticism
A journalist never takes any thing for granted, as he confirms, re-confirms, the information prior to
putting it in words. In simple words ­ he doubts everything until he is certain about that. Besides this, he
is always looking for supporting information and examples before relating it to the readers. However, the
scale for determining level of authenticity may vary from one person to another, but he never falls short
of that.
Be very careful
A journalist must be careful prior to using information regarding any government, Islam and its
injunctions, as these are primary concerns in this part of the world. There are many propaganda sites,
which are claiming to be official ­ though difficult to know and check, but one must be certain.
Secondly, facts and data must be ascertained.
Use of journalistic filters
·
Is it possible?
·
How it can be made appear so?
·
Who can have ulterior motives?
·
Use of the common sense
·
It comes from within ­ who, why, when, where and whither?
Website checklist
·
Authority ­ who is doing it?
·
Affiliation ­ whether connected with reputable organisation or institution
·
Accuracy ­ many a time glaring mistakes
·
Appearance ­ whether well-put together?
·
Does it make sense having such website connected to a particular institution?
·
Links to various websites
·
Is it fair in judgments?
Authorship is perhaps the major criterion used in evaluating information. Who wrote this? When we
look for information with some type of critical value, we want to know the basis of the authority with
which the author speaks. Here are some possible filters:
·
In your own field of study, the author is a well-known and well-regarded name you recognize.
·
When you find an author you do not recognize:
·
The author is mentioned in a positive fashion by another author or another person you trust as an
authority;
·  You found or linked to the author's Web/Internet document from another document you trust;
· The Web/Internet document you are reading gives biographical information, including the author's
position, institutional affiliation and address;
·  Biographical information is available by linking to another document; this enables you to judge
whether the author's credentials allow him/her to speak with authority on a given topic;
·  If none of the above, there is an address and telephone number as well as an e-mail address for the
author in order to request further information on his or her work and professional background. An e-
mail address alone gives you no more information than you already have.
10
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
The publishing body also helps evaluate any kind of document you may be reading. In the print
universe, this generally means that the author's manuscript has undergone screening in order to verify that
it meets the standards or aims of the organization that serves as publisher. This may include peer review.
On the Internet, ask the following questions to assess the role and authority of the 'publisher', which in
this case means the server (computer) where the document lives:
·
Is the name of any organization given on the document you are reading? Are there headers,
footers, or a distinctive watermark that show the document to be part of an official academic or
scholarly Web site? Can you contact the site Webmaster from this document?
·
If not, can you link to a page where such information is listed? Can you tell that it's on the same
server and in the same directory (by looking at the URL)?
·
Is this organization recognized in the field in which you are studying?
·
Is this organization suitable to address the topic at hand?
·
Can you ascertain the relationship of the author and the publisher/server? Was the document that
you are viewing prepared as part of the author's professional duties (and, by extension, within
his/her area of expertise)? Or is the relationship of a casual or for-fee nature, telling you nothing
about the author's credentials within an institution?
·
Can you verify the identity of the server where the document resides? Internet programs such
dnslookup and whois will be of help.
·
Does this Web page actually reside in an individual's personal Internet account, rather than being
part of an official Web site? This type of information resource should be approached with the
greatest caution. Hints on identifying personal pages are available in `understanding and
Decoding URLs'.
Point of view or bias reminds us that information is rarely neutral. Because data is used in selective ways
to form information, it generally represents a point of view. Every writer wants to prove his point, and
will use the data and information that assists him in doing so. When evaluating information found on the
Internet, it is important to examine who is providing the 'information' you are viewing, and what might be
their point of view or bias. The popularity of the Internet makes it the perfect venue for commercial and
sociopolitical publishing. These areas in particular are open to highly 'interpretative' uses of data.
Steps for evaluating point of view are based on authorship or affiliation:
·
First, note the URL of the document. Does this document reside on the Web server of an
organization that has a clear stake in the issue at hand?
If you are looking at a corporate Web site, assume that the information on the corporation
o
will present it in the most positive light.
o  If you are looking at products produced and sold by that corporation, remember: you are
looking at an advertisement.
o  If you are reading about a political figure at the Web site of another political party, you
are reading the opposition.
·
Does this document reside on the Web server of an organization that has a political or
philosophical agenda?
o  If you were looking for scientific information on human genetics, would you trust a
political organization to provide it?
o  Never assume that extremist points of view are always easy to detect. Some sites
promoting these views may look educational.
Many areas of research and inquiry deal with controversial questions, and often the more controversial an
issue is, the more interesting it is. When looking for information, it is always critical to remember that
everyone has an opinion. Because the structure of the Internet allows for easy self-publication, the variety
of points of view and bias will be the widest possible.
11
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
Referral to and/or knowledge of the literature refer to the context in which the author situates his
work. This reveals what the author knows about his or her discipline and its practices. This allows you to
evaluate the author's scholarship or knowledge of trends in the area under discussion. The following
criteria serve as a filter for all formats of information:
·  The document includes a bibliography.
·  The author alludes to or displays knowledge of related sources, with proper attribution.
·  The author displays knowledge of theories, schools of thought, or techniques usually considered
appropriate in the treatment of his or her subject.
·  If the author is using a new theory or technique as a basis for research, he or she discusses the
value and/or limitations of this new approach.
·  If the author's treatment of the subject is controversial, he or she knows and acknowledges this.
Accuracy or verifiability of details is an important part of the evaluation process, especially when you
are reading the work of an unfamiliar author presented by an unfamiliar organization, or presented in a
non-traditional way. Criteria for evaluating accuracy include:
·  For a research document, the data that was gathered and an explanation of the research method(s)
used to gather and interpret it are included.
·  The methodology outlined in the document is appropriate to the topic and allows the study to be
duplicated for purposes of verification.
·  The document relies on other sources that are listed in a bibliography or includes links to the
documents themselves.
·  The document names individuals and/or sources that provided non- published data used in the
preparation of the study.
·  The background information that was used can be verified for accuracy.
Currency refers to the timeliness of information. In printed documents, the date of publication is the first
indicator of currency. For some types of information, currency is not an issue: authorship or place in the
historical record is more important (e.g., T. S. Eliot's essays on tradition in literature). For many other
types of data, however, currency is extremely important, as is the regularity with which the data is
updated. Apply the following criteria to ascertain currency:
·
The document includes the date(s) at which the information was gathered.
·
The document refers to clearly dated information.
·
Where there is a need to add data or update it on a constant basis, the document includes
information on the regularity of updates.
·
The document includes a publication date or a 'last updated' date.
·
The document includes a date of copyright.
·
If no date is given in an electronic document, you can view the directory in which it resides and
read the date of latest modification.
If you found information using one of the search engines available on the Internet, such as AltaVista
or InfoSeek, a directory of the Internet such as Yahoo, or any of the services that rate World Wide Web
pages, you need to know:
·
How the search engine decides the order in which it returns information requested. Some Internet
search engines 'sell' top space to advertisers who pay them to do so.
·
That Internet search engines aren't like the databases found in libraries. Library databases include
subject headings, abstracts, and other evaluative information created by information professionals
to make searching more accurate. In addition, library databases index more permanent and
reliable information.
·
How that search engine looks for information, and how often their information is updated.
All information, whether in print or by byte, needs to be evaluated for authority, appropriateness, and
other personal criteria for value. If you find information that is 'too good to be true', it probably is. Never
12
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
use information that you cannot verify. Establishing and learning criteria to filter information you find on
the Internet is a good beginning for becoming a critical consumer of information in all forms. 'Cast a cold
eye' on everything you read. Question it. Look for other sources that can authenticate or corroborate what
you find. Learn to be skeptical and then learn to trust your instincts.
Search Engines
Publishers of websites think: "Search engines are the roads people travel along when using the Internet to
get places. If you're not putting out signs to capture their attention, they'll never find their way to you!
However, you can use Google, Yahoo and Microsoft more frequently.
For Directories, prefer DMOZ, Yahoo directory and about
For News sites, prefer BBC, CNN, Yahoo news, Google news and Microsoft's MS NBC
Alerts on mobiles, go for
BBC, CNN, Yahoo and Google
Archives, prefer,
CNN, BBC and newspapers ­ many have since publication or later uploaded
For Facts, use
Wikipedia and World fact book
Evaluating web pages: Techniques to apply & questions to ask
Evaluating web pages skilfully requires you to do two things at once:
Train your eye and your fingers to employ a series of techniques that help you quickly find what you
need to know about web pages;
Train your mind to think critically, even suspiciously, by asking a series of questions that will help you
decide how much a web page is to be trusted.
Begin by looking at your search results from a search engine or other source, following through by
investigating the content of page, and extending it beyond the page to what others may say about the page
or its author(s).
1. What can the URL tell you?
1. Before you leave the list of search results ­ before you click and get interested in anything written on
the page ­ glean all you can from the URLs of each page.
2. Then choose pages most likely to be reliable and authentic.
Is it somebody's personal page?
Read the personal pages carefully:
Look for a personal name following a tilde (~), a percent sign (%), or the words 'users,' 'members,' or
'people.'
Is the server a commercial ISP or other provider mostly of web page hosting (like aol.com or
geocities.com
What are the implications?
Personal pages are not necessarily 'bad,' but you need to investigate the author very carefully.
For personal pages, there is no publisher or domain owner vouching for the information in the page.
What type of domain does it come from?
(Educational, non-profit, commercial, government, etc.)
·
Is the domain appropriate for the content?
·
Government sites: look for .gov, .mil, .us, or other country code
·
Educational sites: look for .edu
·
Non-profit organizations: look for .org
·
If from a foreign country, look at the country code and read the page to be sure, who published it.
13
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
What are the implications?
Look for appropriateness! What kind of information source do you think is most reliable for your topic?
Is it published by an entity that makes sense?
Who 'published' the page?
·
In general, the publisher is the agency or person operating the 'server' computer from which the
document is issued.
·
The server is usually named in first portion of the URL (between http:// and the first /)
·
Have you heard of this entity before?
·
Does it correspond the name of the site? Should it?
What are the implications?
You can rely more on information that is published by the source:
·
Look for New York Times news from www.nytimes.com
·
Look for health information from any of the agencies of the National Institute of Health on sites
with nih somewhere in the domain name.
2. Scan the perimeter of the page, looking for answers to these questions:
Techniques for Web Evaluation:
1. Look for links that say, 'About us,' 'Philosophy,' 'Background,' 'Biography,' 'Who am I,' etc.
2. If you cannot find any links like these, you can often find this kind of information if you truncate back
the URL.
INSTRUCTIONS for Truncating back a URL: In the top Location Box, delete the end characters of the
URL stopping just before each / (leave the slash). Press enter to see if you can see more about the author
or the origins/nature of the site providing the page.
Continue this process, one slash (/) at a time, until you reach the first single / which is preceded by the
domain name portion. This is the page's server or 'publisher.'
3. Look for the date 'last updated' - usually at the bottom of a web page.
Check the date on all the pages on the site.
Who wrote the page?
·  Look for the name of the author, or the name of the organisation, institution, agency, or whatever
who is responsible for the page
·  An e-mail contact is not enough
·  If there is no personal author, look for an agency or organization that claims responsibility for the
page.
·  If you cannot find this, locate the publisher by truncating back the URL (see technique above). Does
this publisher claim responsibility for the content? Does it explain why the page exists in any way?
What are the implications?
Some person or agency or entity creates all web pages with a purpose in mind. They do not simply 'grow'
on the web like mildew grows in moist corners.
You are looking for someone who claims accountability and responsibility for the content.
An e-mail address with no additional information about the author is not sufficient for assessing the
author's credentials.
If this is all you have, try emailing the author and asking politely for more information about him/her.
Is the page dated? Is it current enough?
Is it 'stale' or 'dusty' information on a time-sensitive or evolving topic?
CAUTION: Undated factual or statistical information is no better than anonymous information. Don't use
it.
14
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
What are the implications?
How recent the date needs to be depends on your needs.
For some topics you want current information.
For others, you want information put on the web near the time it became known.
In some cases, the importance of the date is to tell you whether the page author is still maintaining an
interest in the page, or has abandoned it.
What are the author's credentials on this subject?
·
Does the purported background or education look like someone who is qualified to write on this
topic?
·
Might the page be by a hobbyist, self-proclaimed expert, or enthusiast?
·
Is the page merely an opinion? Is there any reason you should believe its content more than any other
page?
·
Is the page a rant, an extreme view, possibly distorted or exaggerated?
·
If you cannot find strong, relevant credentials, look very closely at documentation of sources (next
section).
What are the implications?
Anyone can put anything on the web for pennies in just a few minutes. Your task is to distinguish
between the reliable and questionable.
Many web pages are opinion pieces offered in a vast public forum.
You should hold the author to the same degree of credentials, authority, and documentation that you
would expect from something published in a reputable print resource (book, journal article, good
newspaper).
3. Look for indicators of quality information
1. Look for a link called 'links,' 'additional sites,' 'related links,' etc.
2. In the text, if you see little footnote numbers or links that might refer to documentation, take the time to
explore them.
What kinds of publications or sites are they? Reputable? Scholarly?
Are they real? On the web (where no publisher is editing most pages), it is possible to create totally fake
references.
3. Look at the publisher of the page (first part of the URL).
Expect a journal article, newspaper article, and some other publications that are recent to come from the
original publisher IF the publication is available on the web.
Look at the bottom of such articles for copyright information or permissions to reproduce.
Are sources documented with footnotes or links?
·  Where did the author get the information?
·  As in published scholarly/academic journals and books, you should expect documentation.
·  If there are links to other pages as sources, are they to reliable sources?
·  Do the links work?
What are the implications?
In scholarly/research work, the credibility of most writings is proven through footnote documentation or
other means of revealing the sources of information. Saying what you believe without documentation is
not much better than just expressing an opinion or a point of view. What credibility does your research
need?
An exception can be journalism from highly reputable newspapers. But these are not scholarly. Check
with your instructor before using this type of material.
Links that don't work or are to other weak or fringe pages do not help strengthen the credibility of your
research.
15
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
If reproduced information (from another source), is it complete, not altered, not fake or forged?
·
Is it retyped? If so, it could easily be altered.
·
Is it reproduced from another publication?
·
Are permissions to reproduce and copyright information provided?
·
Is there a reason there are not links to the original source if it is online (instead of reproducing it)?
What are the implications?
You may have to find the original to be sure a copy of something is not altered and is complete.
Look at the URL: is it from the original source?
If you find a legitimate article from a reputable journal or other publication, it should be accompanied by
the copyright statement and/or permission to reprint. If it is not, be suspicious.
Try to find the source. If the URL of the document is not to the original source, it is likely that it is
illegally reproduced, and the text could be altered, even with the copyright information present.
Are there links to other resources on the topic?
·
Are the links well chosen, well organized, and/or evaluated/annotated?
·
Do the links work?
·
Do the links represent other viewpoints?
·
Do the links (or absence of other viewpoints) indicate a bias?
What are the implications?
Many well-developed pages offer links to other pages on the same topic that they consider worthwhile.
They are inviting you compare their information with other pages.
Links that offer opposing viewpoints as well as their own are more likely to be balanced and unbiased
than pages that offer only one view. Anything not said that could be said? And perhaps would be said if
all points of view were represented?
Always look for bias.
Especially when you agree with something, check for bias.
4. What do others say?
1. Find out what other web pages link to this page.
a. Use alexa.com URL information:
Simply paste the URL into alexa.com's search box.
You will see, depending on the volume of traffic to the page:
·
Traffic rank
·
Subjective reviews
·
'Site statistics' including some page history, sites that link to the page
·
Contact/ownership info for the domain name
·
A link to the Internet archive of website history 'Wayback Machine'
b. Do a link: search in Google, Yahoo!, or another search engine where this can be done.
INSTRUCTIONS for doing a link: search in Google or Yahoo!
1. Copy the URL of the page you are investigating (Ctrl+C in Windows).
2. Go to the search engine site, and type link: in the search box.
3. Paste the URL of the investigated site into the search box immediately following link: (no space after
the colon).
The pages listed all contain one or more links to the page you are looking for.
If you find no links, try a shorter portion of the URL, stopping after each /.
2. Look the page up in a reputable directory that evaluates its contents (Librarians' Index, Infomine,
About.com, Academic Info, or a specialised directory you trust).
INSTRUCTIONS: Go to the directory and search for the title of the site you are investigating. Look for
the publisher if you can't find a specific page from a larger site.
16
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
3. Look up the author's name in Google or Yahoo!
INSTRUCTIONS in Google: Search the name three ways:
a. without quotes - Jabberwocky Web author
b. enclosed in quotes as a phrase - 'Jabberwocky Web author'
c. enclosed in quotes with * between the first and last name - 'Jabberwocky * Web author' (The * can
stand for any middle initial or name in Google only).
Who links to the page?
·
Are there many links?
·
What kinds of sites link to it?
·
What do they say?
·
Are any of them directories? Try looking at what directories say.
What are the implications?
Sometimes a page is linked to only by other parts of its own site (not much of a recommendation).
Sometimes a page is linked to by its fan club, and by detractors. Read both points of view.
If a page or its site is in a bona fide directory, think about whether there is much critical evaluation of the
links in the directory.
Is the page listed in one or more reputable directories or pages?
What are the implications?
Good directories include a tiny fraction of the web, and inclusion in a directory is therefore noteworthy.
But read what the directory says! It may not be 100% positive.
What do others say about the author or responsible authoring body?
What are the implications?
'Googling someone' (new term for this) can be revealing. Be sure to consider the source. If the viewpoint
is radical or controversial, expect to find detractors. Think critically about all points of view.
5. Does it all add up?
1. Step back and think about all you have learned about the page. Listen to your gut reaction. Think about
why the page was created, the intentions of its author(s).
If you have doubts, ask your instructor or come to one of the library reference desks and ask for advice.
2. Be sensitive to the possibility that you are the victim of irony, spoof, fraud, or other falsehood.
3. Ask yourself if the web is truly the best place to find resources for the research you are doing.
Why was the page put on the web?
·
Inform, give facts, and give data?
·
Explain, persuade?
·
Sell, entice?
·
Share?
·
Disclose?
What are the implications?
These are some of the reasons to think of. The web is a public place, open to all. You need to be aware of
the entire range of human possibilities of intentions behind web pages.
Might it be ironic? Satire or parody?
·
Think about the 'tone' of the page.
·
Humorous? Parody? Exaggerated? Overblown arguments?
17
img
Feature and Column Writing ­ MCM 514
VU
·
Outrageous photographs or juxtaposition of unlikely images?
·
Arguing a viewpoint with examples that suggest that what is argued is ultimately not possible.
What are the implications?
It is easy to be fooled, and this can make you look foolish in turn.
Is this as good as resources I could find if I used the library, or some of the web-based indexes
available through the library, or other print resources?
·
Are you being completely fair? Too harsh? Totally objective? Requiring the same degree of 'proof'
you would from a print publication?
·
Is the site good for some things and not for others?
·
Are your hopes biasing your interpretation?
What are the implications?
What is your requirement (or your instructor's requirement) for the quality of reliability of your
information?
In general, published information is considered more reliable than what is on the web. But many, many
reputable agencies and publishers make great stuff available by 'publishing' it on the web. This applies to
most governments, most institutions and societies, many publishing houses and news sources.
But take the time to check it out.
Conclusion ­
Look before you leap, and for the Internet, look before you use it.
·
In this lecture, a senior journalist Zahid Chaudhry answered the following questions:
·
How careful you are?
·
What you usually do?
·
How far is the Internet helpful?
·
How the Urdu journalists using the Internet?
·
How is different from the English journalists?
18
Table of Contents:
  1. IMPORTANCE OF LANGUAGE:Feature writing, Explanation of the definition
  2. SOURCES OF MATERIAL:Commemorations, Science and Technology
  3. INTERNET USAGE IN FEATURE WRITING:Be very careful, Website checklist
  4. WHAT MAKES A GOOD FEATURE?:Meeting demands of readers
  5. DEMANDS OF A FEATURE:Entertainment and Interest, Both sides of picture
  6. CONDUCTING AND WRITING OF INTERVIEWS:Kinds of interviews
  7. WRITING NOVELTY INTROS:Punch or astonisher intros, Direct quotation intros
  8. STRUCTURE OF FEATURES:Intro or Lead, Transition, Body
  9. SELECTION OF PICTURES, ILLUSTRATIONS AND MAPS:Sources
  10. FEATURES AND EDITORIAL POLICY:Slanting or angling feature
  11. HUMAN INTEREST AND FEATURE WRITING:Obtaining facts, Knowing how to write
  12. NEWSPAPER FEATURE STORY:The Business Story, The Medical Story
  13. THE NEWSPAPER FEATURE STORY IDEA:Conflict, Human interest
  14. MAGAZINE FEATURE VERSUS DAILIES:Feature versus Editorial, An overview
  15. WRITING THE SPECIALISED FEATURE STORY:The Deadline Feature Sidebar
  16. MODERN FEATURE AND ITS TREATMENT:Readers’ constraints
  17. MODERN FEATURE WRITING TECHNIQUE:The Blundell Technique
  18. ADVICE TO FEATURE WRITERS:A guide to better writing, Love Writing
  19. COLUMN WRITING:Definition, Various definitions, Why most powerful?
  20. COLUMN WRITING IN MODERN AGE:Diversity of thought, Individuality
  21. ENGLISH AND URDU COLUMNISTS:More of anecdotal, Letting readers know
  22. TYPES OF COLUMNS:Reporting-in-Depth Columns, Gossip Columns
  23. OBJECTIVES AND IMPORTANCE OF COLUMNS:Friendly atmosphere, Analysis
  24. WHAT ARE THE ESSENTIALS AND BASIC POINTS THAT GO IN TO THE FORMING OF A COLUMN?
  25. STYLE:General and a specialised writing, How can a columnist improve it?
  26. GENERAL STYLE OF THE COLUMN:Unified Style, Anecdotal Style, Departmental Style
  27. STRUCTURE OF A COLUMN:Intro or lead, Main body, Conclusion
  28. COLUMN WRITING TIPS:Write with conviction, Purpose, Content
  29. SELECTION OF A TOPIC:Close to your heart, Things keeping in Queue
  30. QUALITIES OF A COLUMN WRITER:Personal, Professional, Highly Educated
  31. WHAT MUST BE PRACTISED BY A COLUMNIST?:Pleasantness, Fluency
  32. SOURCES OF MATERIAL OF COLUMNS:Constant factors, Interview
  33. USEFUL WRITING DEVICES:Be specific, Use Characterisation, Describe scenes
  34. COMMON WRITING PROBLEMS:Eliminate clichés, Don’t misuse words
  35. WRITING THE COLUMN:Certain thumb rules, After writing the column
  36. ARTICLE WRITING:Introduction, Definition, Contents, Main Segments, Main body
  37. HOW TO WRITE AN ARTICLE?:It is more efficient, It is more believable
  38. TYPES AND SUBJECTS OF ARTICLE:Interview articles, Utility articles
  39. FIVE COMMANDMENTS, NO PROFESSIONAL FORGETS:Use Key Words
  40. ARTICLES WRITING MISTAKES:Plagiarising or 'buying articles, Rambling
  41. WRITING THE ARTICLE:Various parts of article, The topic sentence
  42. What to do when you have written the article?:Writing the first draft
  43. TEN STANDARD ARTICLE FORMATS:The informative articles
  44. LEGAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR WRITERS:Libel, Doctoring Quotes
  45. REVISION:Importance of language, Feature writing, Sources of material